Leave a comment

Comments 28

mdyesowitch June 17 2008, 17:11:06 UTC
I wonder if these protesters realize that many of the arguments they're making now, their parents and grandparents used to try to block interracial marriages.
In many cases, that wouldn't bother them.

Reply


pezzonovante June 17 2008, 17:26:11 UTC
I wonder if these protesters realize that many of the arguments they're making now, their parents and grandparents used to try to block interracial marriages.

They do, but they rationalize it by claiming that since being gay is an unnatural and immoral choice and being black is just happenstance, it's OK to make the same arguments because they're right now and they were wrong then.

Reply

dirkcjelli June 17 2008, 17:30:46 UTC
Actually, I honestly suspect their response would be more like...

"How dare you suggest I'm a racist!" and beat the outrage drum some more.

Reply


One day, people will wake up and realize this ain't a democracy... until that day, there is liquor. dirkcjelli June 17 2008, 17:26:28 UTC
Hate so is a family value... just look at the Nazi party platform.

Family family family, and lock the gays and 'ethnics' in a deep dark hole.

... of course, they learned it from watching us.

Reply

Re: One day, people will wake up and realize this ain't a democracy... until that day, there is liqu dirkcjelli June 17 2008, 17:27:02 UTC
(after all, its in the Bible.)

Reply


shogunhb June 17 2008, 17:28:03 UTC
But... interracial marriages ARE a sin. Sin with me baby!

Reply

shadowravyn June 17 2008, 17:41:17 UTC
You only married me to rebel, didn't you?!

Reply

shogunhb June 17 2008, 17:56:12 UTC
I did it to spite my parents, of course.

Reply

shadowravyn June 17 2008, 18:25:55 UTC
I knew it. I am shocked, appalled, and in tears.

Woe is me.

Reply


anitra June 17 2008, 19:45:07 UTC
Short answer: moral NIMBYism. It's like blocking one's ears and eyes: "If we don't let gays get married, then they'll see the error of their ways!"

Longer answer: gay marriage squicks me out a little, and more importantly, is an offense against God, but, as nightskyre much more eloquently said in his post, I make an effort NOT to impose so-called-"Christian" morals on my fellow citizens.

Reply

shadowravyn June 17 2008, 20:42:14 UTC
I make an effort NOT to impose so-called-"Christian" morals on my fellow citizens.

And that is what I consider most important.

Reply

anitra June 17 2008, 20:50:06 UTC
It's also what sets me apart from most so-called "fundamentalists", who want us to be a "Christian nation".

When topics like this come up in politics, I have to remind myself that it's about giving equal protection to people who I don't agree with, not about forcing people to (externally, at least) do what's right. Which is really what the two sides of this issue come down to - just like "pro-choice" and "pro-life", they're not truly opposite positions, they just have opposite effects.

Reply

sirroxton June 18 2008, 12:45:22 UTC
wish more fundamentalists were like you. It's still all weird to me, though.

"Hi, your thoughts on sexuality squick me. God finds it abominable, and it's one of the reasons you'll be burning in eternal torment. Really, everything that you think important is a wretched hubris -- I can't even give you credit for the things you get right because you do it for the wrong reasons. You're a failure as a human being. But let's not talk about that. Instead hang out in this living room, and let's chat all nice-nice about this and that."

Sorry to bomb-throw, especially in someone else's journal. I just... I dunno, it really bugs me. I can play it all cool and social too. I can sit down with, say, you and pretend that you don't think that everything I hold dear is superficial and that my life as it stands is a failure. It seems... dishonest, somehow. Am I misrepresenting matters?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up