Leave a comment

Comments 5

mobbsy October 15 2004, 01:54:06 UTC
...because it's a convenient fraction of a kilogramme which gives a bar of about the right size?

Reply

senji October 15 2004, 01:58:37 UTC
I hadn't thought of 62.5 being 1000/16.

Reply

vyvyan October 15 2004, 02:39:35 UTC
It strikes me that 62.5 is exactly half way between the 2 more sensible sounding sizes of 50g and 75g. (This is hardly a full explanation, and in fact not why I guessed this number anyway!)

Reply


requiem_17_23 October 15 2004, 13:41:38 UTC
So it was once either 56.7g or 70.9g, and they found it either too big or too small and changed it.

They have tests about which size to make it, and people don't do round numbers.

Reply


damerell October 15 2004, 22:39:30 UTC

Leave a comment

Up