picked up Diana Glyer's The Company They Keep: C.S. Lewis and JRR Tolkien as Writers in Community, knowing that this is a book I will be happy to read piecemeal. Early on she takes to task Inklings scholars who insist, sometimes quoting from letters or diaries, that the Inklings, who met informally for nearly twenty years, had no effect on one
(
Read more... )
Comments 70
Good grief. And they didn't read Lewis's other comment on Tolkien, that he either paid no attention OR threw out the whole thing and started over from scratch?
As for "uninflulenceable", that doesn't sound like much of a retort to me. For one thing, Lewis's 'bandersnatch' comment is in third person, memoir-tense :-), looking way back, speaking to outsiders about Tolkien. The Tolkien quote is second person present, as though speaking directly to Lewis, while it's all going on. (Or not going on, as those scholars would have it.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
That's how I feel. Does my crit circle influence my work beyond the technical aspects? Probably not. They're not my target readership, and my bloodthirsty brand of neo-pulp would not normally find a place on their shelves - which is a good thing. People who like a genre, don't read critically.
Reply
Reply
(I check the fun levels using genre-friendly beta readers.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I also find other people's interpretations of my words fascinating. Four different people can read the same story and come away with four different reactions to it, it's wild. I actually had an argument break out in the comments of my fandom journal over whether or not a secondary character in a piece I'd written should be considered a villain. It meant I'd done my job, because I had deliberately kept that character's morality rather grey.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment