In the interest of getting something up here besides me whining about how broke I am, I offer an intellectual challenge!
Under the cut is a drawing of two nekkid people in bed togeher. They are both butt-naked. They are rosy of cheek and well satisfied. So! Is this porn? Or simply nude art? Whdo you think so? What's the difference?
Um. . . .
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Obviously a shot of a naked woman giving the camera a 'come hither' look doesn't count as mid-coitus. But a naked woman splayed across the hood of a car is obviously pornography.
I actually have a picture of this same couple mid-coitus . . . . but with no nudity. It's flaming obvious what they're doing, but there's enough drapes of cloth and loose hair to disguise any naughty bits. They'd be more naked wearing swimsuits. I might add it to this post when I get home just to confuse the issue. XD
Reply
Reply
Reply
Obviously a shot of a naked woman giving the camera a 'come hither' look doesn't count as mid-coitus. But a naked woman splayed across the hood of a car is obviously pornography.
On the flip side of the coin, what about people who are turned on by intimacy? They are out there. They would consider this picture arousing.
Reply
Reply
It its just nudity for the sake of nudity and possibly because sex sells than its porn.
In this case it looks all sweet and romantic and its obviously something you love even when they're not naked so I'd say art! :D
Reply
Leave a comment