OMENS: Real Life Twin Heavenly Twilight Born 12/27 on Second Life, $500.00 Raccoon Casino Trip
I'm going to combine 2 Blog Entries that I feel should really be separate. However, I think that because they're all "glowing" with Psychic Significance, I'm grouping them together so that people can get a sample of what a typical day of a Psychic is like when you have these things manifest throughout the course of a day.
Early this morning at around 5 am, I was hanging out on Second Life.
I was talking with Heavenly whom I had met in an Orgy on Second Life.
It turns out she's a Twin born on 12/27. She lives in California. Her Twin Sister already has 4 children. She's age 25.
My mom wanted to go to the Casino. I was aversive because I try not to "press my luck." While we were getting ready to go and drive there, I saw a Raccoon as well as a squirrel.
I ended up winning $250.00. I gave all of it to my mom. I had been saying that I've been bleeding financially from all the money that my former business associate Davis borrowed from my family, specifically from my mom.
So I always give any money I make to her and don't keep any of it for myself.
I made a deal with the Subconscious Collective that if they help me with the Slot Machines, I won't keep any of the money for myself and give it just to my mum. I've kept that promise.
I never keep a single penny.
The Subconscious Collective knows if I've kept any money for myself since they can monitor everything you say and do with your own eyes and ears as Security Cameras as well as the eyes and ears of people around you or loved ones.
We left the Casino at 6:25 pm PST and returned home at 7:15 pm PST.
========================
ANONYMITY AND CHANGING PEOPLE'S NAMES CITED IN PSYCHIC RESEARCH PROBES
On a side note, I've decided to start changing the names of the people I meet online because I have this sneaky suspicion that Robyn and her group of friends are still snooping my Blog.
I once got confronted by someone whom I did a Psychic Reading off of on Shangri-La, and she confronted me extremely pissed about the stuff I divulged for my Psychic Reading because it's tied to people's names as Acronyms and their birthdates.
I've also been finding some of the people who I try to cite as my sources stop talking to me.
On one hand, I understand that people feel like they're entitled to their Privacy, but on the other hand, in the interest of Psychic Research and uncovering the Truth, they should be reported if they do possess traits.
I also perceive divulging their information as more like someone who has won the Lottery.
When someone wins the Lottery, the news reporters find out who the Lottery Commission has awarded the money. It can't exactly be kept as a secret.
So when I point out someone's birthdate and name when I stake claim that it's following a Psychic pattern I'm using to clear my name when it comes to the incident in 2004, I feel that I'm entitled to questioning witnesses or people who are relevant to the case.
People think it's just some random probe and where I'm poking into other people's business that I have no right to discuss or divulge. However, I've said that I'm like on a level akin to an Ambassador to the Planet.
When you work for the Earth as a Living Organism where whatever is on Planet is part of its body, what people think "belongs to them" is overruled by it belonging to the Planet.
The Planet Earth has a right to examine or probe any part of its own body.
One thing I've said is that if you don't like the way Earth as a Living Organism lays down the House Rules for its own body:
GO FIND ANOTHER PLANET TO LIVE ON.
In the mean time, quit complaining.
That's why I've been making a move to establish that I can make my Psychic Research Blog align with the Associated Press Feed under the claim that the Subconscious Collective will plug me into the "Planetary RSS Feed" keeping me abreast of things that happen in my real life environment to align with what hits the top of the News Feed.
If I can prove that I'm in tune with the Associated Press Feed where you're seeing a consistent, and possibly even daily, alignment of encounters I have in real life that match what is posted on the Front Page News, that means there's a high probability that my Psychic Theories are indeed correct.
I claim that for people who are "worried" about the Power that I possess that the Subconscious Collective can read everyone's minds.
That includes mine.
Now, assuming the Planet Earth or Mother Earth is believed to be a "benevolent" or "good" entity, why would Earth or the Subconscious Collective entrust me with this Power if I was a bad person?
That's why I've been dropping hints about how my Psychic Abilities are hereditary and where you can trace them back 100 years or past 3 generations.
I've been hinting that when you decode my name, it can be transcribed as me being a "Child of LT" (grandmother born 12/20 as the 12th 20th Letters) making me a Child of Light.
It's where my name can be unlocked to align with the name "Christ" as 77 for Iridium and my Initials and where the Cross for Jesus Christ said "IN RI" that can be rewritten as In Rhode Island that became a State on 5/29, which is why I was born.
JFK was the youngest President born 5/29 aligning with the U.S. States Rhode Island and Wisconsin that breaks down into Massachusetts 2/6, Connecticut, 1/9, and Oregon/Arizona 2/14.
Ronald Reagan was the oldest President born 2/6 which is the U.S. State Massachusetts that can break down into Alaska 1/3 twice.
I even joke about how I look like Superman.
The Superman Humor always makes me laugh because everyone knows that Superman had the worst disguise ever with a pair of glasses. It was so obvious that Clark Kent was Superman.
Superman doesn't even wear gloves to hide his fingerprints.
I don't care how clumsy Clark Kent tries to be or if he tries to comb his hair differently. Clark Kent is the same height, build, and weight as Superman.
When Clark Kent disappears, Superman appears. When Superman disappears, Clark Kent appears.
Superman doesn't even hide that he has Super Speed. So people are smart enough to reason out that if Clark Kent appears a second later that if they suspect he's Superman, Clark Kent must have used Suepr Speed to change and appear.
Clark Kent is always around where there's a news story, especially just after Superman flies off after fixing the problem.
You'd have to be BLIND not to figure out the Identity of Clark Kent.
It makes Lex Luthor and all the other Super Villain Master Minds look really stupid not being able to make the connection that Clark Kent is Superman.
It was even worse when Lois Lane, who is this brilliant reporter, can't even figure out that her own news reporting partner is the Man of Steel.
In real life, people think they'd NEVER be as blind as the characters in the Superman Universe not to figure it out.
However, I keep saying I'm standing in front of people the entire time saying I have Psychic Abilities and that I do this or that using the Psychic Field, which is very much like Superman, and people just ignore me and write me off as a nut job.
There is an irony to this.
- People will see what they want to see
- People will believe in God if they want to believe in God
- People will believe in Magic if they want to believe in Magic
- People will believe in Ghosts if they want to believe in Ghosts
I've repeatedly said that the movie "Kung Fu Panda" where Po's father Mr. Ping best explains this. When Po couldn't figure out why the Dragon Scroll was blank, Mr. Ping tells Po that the secret ingredient to his soup is... NOTHING.
People just have to believe that it's special.
When you hear me talking about my amusement when people don't see me as a "Psychic Superman" even though I look like the Comic Strip Character, it's more about "What do you see?"
Like when you look up to one of your parents or someone you idolize (even like a Sports Star) and perceive them as as Hero.
If you want to look up to a Firefighter as a Hero, nothing has changed with the individual. He is still the same. You've just chosen to look at him in that light.
When you see a guy who beholds this gorgeous Playboy Playmate as an Aphrodite Goddess, nothing has really changed with the female that is the object of desire. The guy just chooses to see the woman that way.
On the negative side of things, if a woman chooses to see a guy smitten with her as a Sta1ker, that's her choice. That's her perception.
I learned that harsh lesson with Isabe11a Va1entine.
No matter how hard I tried to change her mind and prove to her that I was good person, she refused to believe otherwise. No amount of begging, groveling, and providing evidence to the contrary would ever change her mind.
Because she believes.
It doesn't matter if she's being irrational.
She made up her mind.
That's one of the tragic lessons that can be learned. I practically live with people constantly discriminating against me for claiming to be Psychic.
I'm called all kind of insulting and derogatory names. I'm the butt of people's jokes. When people who dont' like me tell their friends about that "crazy Rod person," it's easier to believe them than anything I say or provide as evidence to prove contrary to their opinions.
The opinions people form aren't even based off of anything logical.
For example, people will say, "Oh well, all the evidence I need is that in your Blog around 6/23/2004, you psycho yelling and screaming at this person Charlie claiming that he is guilty of 2nd Degree murder over the Death of Mattie Stepanek."
Because of that one incident, that is being used to judge "Rod's Entire Life."
People can say that I post kooky Blog Entries about Psychic Claims, but they're not experts on the Psychic Field. So how can they judge whether what I say is right or wrong?
In 2004 when I was just starting, people had a legitimate claim is saying that I don't know much of anything about the Psychic Field and that my theories are no better than other people's theories who know little about the Occult.
That was 7 years ago.
However, I've continued to dedicate time and research. I never quit studying the Psychic Field. I made it my passion and hobby where I put in the work hours 7 days a week. I'd probably clock in about 100 hours/week during the first 2 years when I was trying really hard to clear my name.
After I mastered that, I downgraded, but only because things got easier. Psychic Manifestations started appearing faster.
So this is where I am today.
=====================
Cigarettes Will Carry Grisly New Warning Labels
AP
FDA Cigarette Labels AP - This image provided by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday, June 21, 2011 shows one of nine …
New cigarette labels Slideshow:New cigarette labels
Related Quotes MO 27.31 -0.01
PM 68.05 -0.39
^GSPC 1,295.52 0.00
By MICHAEL FELBERBAUM, AP Tobacco Writer - Tue Jun 21, 7:21 pm ET
RICHMOND, Va. - Rotting teeth and gums. Diseased lungs. A sewn-up corpse of a smoker. Cigarette smoke coming out of the tracheotomy hole in a man's neck. Cigarette packs in the U.S. will have to carry these macabre images in nine new warning labels that are part of a campaign by the Food and Drug Administration to use fear and disgust to discourage Americans from lighting up.
The labels, announced on Tuesday, represent the biggest change in cigarette packs in the U.S. in 25 years.
At a time when the drop in the nation's smoking rate has come to a standstill, the government is hoping the in-your-face labels will go further than the current surgeon general warnings toward curbing tobacco use, which is responsible for about 443,000 deaths a year in the U.S.
"These labels are frank, honest and powerful depictions of the health risks of smoking," Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement.
The FDA estimates the labels will cut the number of smokers by 213,000 in 2013, with smaller additional reductions through 2031.
Other countries such as Canada and Uruguay have used graphic, even grisly, warnings for years, and various studies suggest they spur people to quit. But exactly how effective they are is a matter of debate, since the warnings are usually accompanied by other government efforts to stamp out smoking.
"I think it's a great deterrent for kids," said Kristen Polland, 24, of Prattville, Ala. "If you start there, you have won half of the battle."
Rhonda Vanover, 43, of Cincinnati, on the other hand, said: "No one is going to stop me __ unless they make it illegal. Cigarettes get me through the day. They are part of my life."
The labels also include images of a smoker wearing an oxygen mask and a mother and baby with smoke swirling nearby. Some images are not graphic at all; one shows a man wearing an "I Quit" T-shirt.
The warnings will take up the entire top half - both front and back - of a pack of cigarettes. They must also appear in advertisements and constitute 20 percent of each ad. Cigarette makers will have to run all nine labels on a rotating basis. They have until the fall of 2012 to comply.
The legality of the new labels is already being challenged in a federal lawsuit bought by some of the major tobacco companies, which argue that the warnings will relegate the brand name to the bottom half of the cigarette package, making it difficult or impossible to see.
A spokesman for Richmond-based Altria Group Inc., parent company of the nation's largest cigarette maker, Philip Morris USA, said the company was looking at the final labels and had no further comment. Altria Group is not a party in the federal lawsuit.
A pack-a-day smoker would see the graphic warnings more than 7,000 times per year.
American Cancer Society CEO John R. Seffrin said the labels have the potential to "encourage adults to give up their deadly addiction to cigarettes and deter children from starting in the first place."
The introduction of graphic warning labels was required in a 2009 law that, for the first time, gave the federal government authority to regulate tobacco. Tuesday's announcement follows reviews of scientific literature, public comments and results from an FDA-contracted study of 36 labels proposed last November.
The U.S. first mandated the use of warning labels stating, "Cigarettes may be hazardous to your health" in 1965. The current warning labels - put on cigarette packs in the mid-1980s - say more explicitly that smoking can cause lung cancer, heart disease and other illnesses. But the warnings contain no pictures; they consist only of text in a small box.
The share of Americans who smoke has fallen dramatically since 1970, from nearly 40 percent to about 20 percent. But the rate has stalled since about 2004, with about 46 million adults in the U.S. smoking cigarettes. It's unclear why it hasn't budged, but some experts have cited tobacco company discount coupons on cigarettes and lack of funding for programs to discourage smoking or to help smokers quit.
In recent years, more than 30 countries or jurisdictions have introduced labels similar to those created by the FDA. The World Health Organization said in a survey done in countries with graphic labels that a majority of smokers noticed the warnings and more than 25 percent said the warnings led them to consider quitting.
In 2000, Canada introduced blunt warning labels that included images of a pregnant woman smoking, a child and parent puffing away, and a drooping cigarette to illustrate the risk of impotence from smoking. Since then, the county's smoking rate has declined from about 26 percent to about 20 percent. How much the warnings contributed is unclear because the country took other steps to reduce smoking.
David Hammond, a health behavior researcher at the University of Waterloo in Canada, who worked with the firm designing the labels for the FDA, said that while the images are graphic, they are necessary.
"This isn't about doing what's pleasant for people," he said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110621/ap_on_he_me/us_fda_cigarette_labels