I was interested to see Betsy Bird's comments on her
Fuse #8 blog today about a new graphic novel called
Hereville: How Mirka Got Her Sword (warning: autoplay video at source). Among other things, the novel includes lots of information about Orthodox Judaism, which caused Betsy to comment:Think about children’s fantasy novels and religion for a
(
Read more... )
Comments 18
Reply
So that raises another question in my mind: where would you say the dividing line is between representing a religion as part of the characters' lives and thinking in a non-preachy way, and coming across as preachy? Do you think the dividing line is different for different people, or is there an objective measurement for this kind of thing?
Reply
Reply
Or the antagonist loses because he doesn't obey the moral teachings of the writer.
Or one or more characters keep repeating a point over and over.
It gets interesting when the character actually struggles with the rightness of what she's doing.
.
Reply
Reply
I've read Despereaux and can't say that it struck me as a Christian allegory at all, so that's interesting to me. And I hadn't known about Locomotion -- that makes me want to pick up some Woodson and check it out.
Reply
Reply
But here's the other thing: won't a sincere Jew - or Christian, or Muslim, or member of the Native American Church, or whatever - who is setting off on a quest to become a heroine just naturally express her values through her actions? That's why I can't really see a clear distinction between type one and type two.
Just my two cents.
Reply
BTW, I also think the distinctions, in general, are not as clear cut as all that. If you are making up the religion but dealing with ethical/moral issues in your story, your own beliefs, whatever they are, are likely to shine through. This is what Tolkien does in LOTR - admittedly not a children's book, but certainly beloved by many teens.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment