Leave a comment

Comments 26

thegreatesthits December 19 2005, 16:51:50 UTC
LOVER, I AM SO METAQUOTING THIS, OK?!!!!

xxxx

Reply

rionaleonhart December 19 2005, 16:54:33 UTC
Really? Hee, thank you!

(...DAMN YOU, MR TUMNUS.)

Reply

thegreatesthits December 19 2005, 16:57:51 UTC
Hee! *adores you so much omg*

Reply

thegreatesthits December 19 2005, 17:04:23 UTC
TA-DAAAA! May I also mention how tempting it was to title that as 'fawn porn'?

Reply


saralotte December 19 2005, 18:03:50 UTC
I don't know you, so this is oh so random, and but that is EXACTLY what Tumnus said to me. Except less amusingly. Even down to the child molesting. It's true. Please leave my head now.
(He also added: "You hadn't realised the statues coming to life = the harrowing of hell until I dramatised it with my sooper sexy attractiveness, had you? Eh?" and I had to admit this to be true.)

Reply


livii December 19 2005, 18:10:42 UTC
You're brilliant, you know. :D

I also found him far sexier than a goat-man ought to be. I couldn't quite figure out why they didn't put a shirt on him. But then, I liked him without the shirt. ;)

But the Lucy/Tumnus subtext was SO WRONG it did throw me rather a lot, heh.

Reply

cmdr_zoom December 20 2005, 04:27:29 UTC
I also found him far sexier than a goat-man ought to be.

Fauns pretty much are teh sex, in the original source. Where do you think "satyriasis" comes from?

And this particular faun is also sad and fawn-eyed and insecure and oh so nervous and vulnerable, which just adds to his appeal with a certain segment of the audience.

Reply


idan_cohen December 19 2005, 18:23:52 UTC
As a represantive of the Back Hair Association For Better Living (Through Back Hair), I approve of this post.

Reply


saaski_moql December 19 2005, 20:50:02 UTC
XD

Reply


Leave a comment

Up