Several weeks ago, I watched Avengers. I thought it was rather fun, but don't have stronger feelings about it than that. There was one plot hole which irritated both me and the unfannish friend who watched the movie with me, however.
(
So, about the Hulk… )
Comments 32
(The comment has been removed)
Tony does get his science nerd on with Bruce in a very cute manner - more of a "let's be science BFFs!" thing, but yeah, I can see way more slashiness there than with Steve.
He flirts more with Loki than anyone else except Pepper, though. (Yes, really. *g*)
Reply
Oh my god thank you I'm not the only one who saw that XD
Reply
IMO, Tony's an adrenaline junkie, and the fact that he was terrified only made the situation more exciting to him.
Reply
I agree, this seemed a bit fast. I can fanwank to a degree that it harkened back to the conversation Bruce had with Tony earlier about control ultimately being achieved through acceptance and that in the end Bruce accepted the Hulk whereas before he distanced himself from him "the other guy" but it was quite a steep lurning curve. :D
Of course, I'm also willing to cut the movie more slack because on the whole I loved it. I thought Whedon avoided the big potential pitfalls and used the whole ensemble well.
In German, "remember" is a transitive verb, for god's sake.* Two gods shouting at each other should not use such suspect grammar, especially not twice in a row.
What did they say? I have only seen the movie in English so far.
Reply
I'm not really happy with the thought of a development process / acceptance that takes place so quickly. It doesn't seem believable. Maybe that's why they left out the explanation completely and let viewers come to their own conclusions...?
Not really a good solution either, though. Whatever the cause, it should have been made very clear, IMO, and it wasn't. *gnarfle*
What did they say? I have only seen the movie in English so far. It wasn't showing in English, unfortunately; I usually prefer to avoid translations, because there so often seem to be issues like this ( ... )
Reply
Loki: Ich erinnere auch unsere Kindheit, aber es war ganz anders, blablabla!
Autsch. Megaautsch.
Erklärungsversuch? Teilweise Maschinenübersetzung ohne Lektorat hinter. Kaum Budget für einen Übersetzer, weshalb dann sowas bei rauskommt.
Wobei Synchro-Übersetzungen eigentlich umgeschrieben werden um auf die Mundbewegungen zu passen. Es hätte jemandem auffallen müssen, spätestens des Synchronsprechern, von denen man erwartete, dass sie Deutsch können.
Reply
So oder so ist es gruselig. Sprache wandelt sich zwar, aber manchen Veränderungen sollte man sich so lange wie möglich entgegenstemmen. Die Verwendung passt auch einfach nicht für diese Charaktere - Götter springen in der Regel nicht auf die neuesten Sprachtrends auf. Wenn es nicht gerade supercoole Jugendgötter sind, jedenfalls. ;) Bei Pan würde ich vielleicht noch mit mir reden lassen...
Reply
That said- I mean, obviously there are Problems with Captain America as a concept, and there's a 3000 word lj post in there somewhere, but I thought that Whedon did a really good job of addressing them, and of addressing the inherent moral greyness of a SuperSekrit Team of Superheroes fighting for AMERICA ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
I would absolutely have bought that explanation if the movie had explained things to me that way! :-) I really wish they'd just said *something*. They had the chance to set the rules for the Hulk's homicidal/rational transformations however they wished, but not mentioning any reason at all for a pretty damn major change - leaving the viewers to guess and make up their own theories - was a mistake, IMO.
I love RDJ but lately he seems to mostly play a caricatured version of himself.
Yes! He does, doesn't he? It does fit the character of Tony Stark very well, but considering that he played Sherlock Holmes exactly the same way... I think he's actually a very good actor, he just seems to be stuck in a bit of a rut.
I quite enjoyed the final showdown as well, though it was a tad too long. But it wasn't as gratuitous as it could've been.Yeah, they did manage to get many things in that were interesting in terms of characterization, which helped. For example, I (and my friend too, ( ... )
Reply
But why? It'd be so much fun to see Erik be a total BAMF, really let loose and rip an alien army apart, and then turn around to look at the SHIELD forces with a total poker face....
... and smile.
XDD As soon as the new meme post opens I'm prompting this.
I'm also gonna include a line about Tony's armour totally coincidentally just suddenly falling off of him. These things happen.
And yes, Charles would be busyily facepalming at home while being secretly pleased.
Actually, I wonder if Loki's helmet would stop Charles... Because if not, Charles could get Loki to close the portal thing while Erik takes care of the aliens and it would take less than five minutes of them both. And Charles would raise a brow and go, "I don't really understand what you need five people and a military platoon for."
Reply
Reply
Reply
I've... kind of been dipping my toe into the Tony/Loki pool. Or maybe my leg. So for one thing, I don't like Tony going out with other people! *g* And beyond that, I just can't read fanfic with Steve in a carrying role.
LOL! Thor would probably enjoy being petted, as long as he could quaff some ale while you were doing it. Good choice, really, since he's one of the very few heroes I could see as pettable. *g*
the x-men asked iron man to help them out during a mission-- and then magneto showed up.
LOL! Poor Tony, talk about bad luck... maybe a rain check?
Reply
Leave a comment