Can someone convince me that an iPad with connectivity therefore for 30$ a month providing me with internet service basically any and everywhere at any time in a form that's less convenient than a laptop but way more convenient than my phone, and could also be used as a makeshift Kindle would be a bad idea? Otherthan the start up cost, obviously
(
Read more... )
Comments 16
Reply
Reply
I don't know that it's form is any less convenient than a laptop is. You pull it out of your bag and start using it immediately, without having to open it up first.
But it will definitely get you internet access most everywhere in a form that, as an iPhone user, I've found to be so very much nicer than via most other phone browsers. (I have a Palm T|X upon which web browsing was the most painful thing I've ever done.)
Reply
Web browsing on the Centro is painful as well. The pre is better, but still not great.
Reply
Also, PC World has recently released a test of the major 3G networks and their speed. AT&T seems to be the clear winner in their tests. I've been an AT&T, then Cingular, then AT&T user for a long while now, and have had excellent service from them. Your mileage may vary, of course.
Reply
Reply
http://government.zdnet.com/?p=8177
I saw it basically as a bigger version of my Acer Netbook and Kindle, so had no need to look into it much.
Reply
Reply
I have a Sprint air card, and I get web access any time anywhere with it, on whatever laptop I want. My Sony Vaio laptop has a "browse web" button that allows me to hit the internet without booting Windows, and taking a couple of minutes - it's almost instant.
But, I'm not a Mac person. Windows apps have finally caught up to the desktop publishing capabilities of the Mac, and I just don't see a reason for them.
Reply
Leave a comment