I've been out of things with a bad cold this holiday weekend, so I missed alot of news! So I'm putting all the news I could find into this one post
This is long so all of it is under the cut.
(
Read It All Here - Alan Rickman's Brain, Jason Isaac's Lips, Claymation Voldie, Fudge Erased, and Some Really Bad Essays )
Comments 26
Reply
It's true that Harry is supposed to look like James, but right after DH came out people were struck by the fact that in Harry is described as having long hair when he is on the run, and several artists on DeviantArt have drawn a very Snape-like Harry kneeling over the body of Snape.
Look... At... Me... by ~TomScribble on deviantART
Reply
and although it is clever done and an awefull lot of work
I would not even start to dream about,
such a litery 100% canon faithfull performance is utterly boring after a few minutes.
"thanks god WB screws the canon from every angle possible": I am tempting to say.
When you want to see what the canon tells you: Read the book
When you want to see the movie walk on its own legs: Forget the canon
That was the thought that lingered, not how artfull it was done.
Reply
Reply
Please don't judge all Literature teachers by that guy! Take it from me - most literature professors I've known are not snobs about what they read. Most of them read modern books and include them in their classes, and as time goes by there are fewer and fewer of these purists who think Literature died in the 19th century.
And you are so right about Tennyson and all the poets - people wanted those books for the language, the rhyme, the sound, and the story. The music! This guy thinks it's because Tennyson was famous - no! He became famous because he appealed to the people, just as Shakespeare did! Shakespeare was certainly an influence on every British poet and he was also wrote plays! People used to have poetry recitations was for the drama and acting, not the fact that they wanted to sit around analyzing fine poetry.
Reply
Reply
Let's just say that guy is wrong, wrong, wrong!
I've tried Thomas Pynchon's books back when I was in college. Much too complex for me. I read for pleasure, not work.
That writer just seems to echo the idea that people have become "dumbed down" where literature is concerned, and that's just not true. If anything, the public schools stress literature from kindergarten up more than they did when I was in school.
Reply
Reply
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Um. Okay. Not to get ad hominem about it, but how old is this person herself?
"...I could never see Snape as the ultimate love-lorn hero -- sure, he risked a lot in Lily Potter's memory, but his love apparently didn't extend to treating her only child with the kindness a truly sacrificial love would have demanded."Well, to play devil's advocate, there is a point there; Severus never exorcised all his demons, no, and whether or not he still hated Harry at the end (indeed, whether or not he ever truly hated him, although that's slightly outside the scope of this post), it seems he never did come to a place of even calm civility, much less kindness. Harry was, at the least, a serious psychological trigger for him, and that damage was never healed (and from Harry's perspective it does seem he didn't try; what was really the case, we can't quite know). But I don't see how all this invalidates the "sacrificial" nature of anything he did ( ... )
Reply
That will definitely be a case of having a drink just before the movie! I need to find a designated driver before I go.
Great post - lots of excellent points. :)
Reply
Easy to do if seeing the midnight show at Azkatraz. (Bars? In San Francisco? I must be joking.)
Reply
Snape portrays the classic version of unrequited love. He has chosen Lily, and though she has taken another, he will continue to love her and her memory. At one time, centuries ago, Snape would have been viewed as an expression of the highest form of love.
Hope you're feeling better, SIP.
Reply
Leave a comment