This post was not only prompted by a remarkably stupid NY Times review of the "Game of Thrones" TV series, in which the reviewer thought the story was a polemic against global warming, claimed that women don't like fantasy, and further claimed that women do love sex, so the sex was gratuitously crammed in to please them
(
Read more... )
Comments 89
As a data-point, I read very little epic fantasy these days, and what I do is all written by women. I prefer my fantasy domestic, contemporary, or urban.
---L.
Reply
Lacking actual data and basing my opinion only on bookshelves, I would say that publishers have figured out/decided that heroic fiction with female protagonists who have interiority* will find its audience in YA and in romance, but not so much in mainstream epic fantasy, and that sort of epic is often what women write. (Did the Deed of Paksenarrion, which qualifies under the above, ever reach the bestseller heights?)
* Is that a word? I'm groggy. I mean that the character's reactions and processing of those reactions are a significant part of the plot.
Reply
I'm only reading the latter, natch.
---L.
Reply
Reply
I don't know the readership breakdown on that series, but if you count the series as a whole, they have sold a trainload of books.
Marion Zimmer Bradley, too.
Reply
Reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragonlance
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Or maybe someone was holding a gun to her head.
I think plenty of women like epic fantasy. I was waiting to pick up my younger son from a flute lesson, and there was a girl there, about 13, waiting for her music lesson. She was reading one of the books in either the Wheel of Time series or Song of Ice and Fire series (honestly, I can't recall which it was), and when I asked about it, she was completely with it. ... Which is to say, young female readers are still picking up these sorts of books too.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment