Leave a comment

Comments 45

batwrangler December 30 2009, 00:40:16 UTC
Oh. My. Goodness.

(I remember seeing this in bookstores, but apparently missed the fervor over it and have never read it.)

Reply


musesfool December 30 2009, 00:43:03 UTC
I totally trace my preference for fictional hetcest to reading Flowers in the Attic at the age of 9.

Reply


veejane December 30 2009, 00:45:17 UTC
1. I knew about the poisoned doughnuts, because I have seen the tail end of the 1970s movie version. (I have never read the book.)

1A. The only reason I know there are sequels is that one time, a couple years ago, snacky sat me down in a B&N and told me in detail the plots of the remaining books. They sounded hilariously terrible.

2. If you have never read a V. C. Andrews novel, you will find that they are all alike. Actually, that's literally true, because she died very early on in her franchise, so the succeeding authors did not have a lot of pointers as to what her audience liked so much. I read just enough of them in highschool to discover the following important axioms:
* The heroine will always have a ridiculous name, usually a noun.
* There are always strange and wealthy relatives waiting in the wings.
* The heroine will be sexually menaced by someone genetically related to her, but whom she does not know at all.
* The heroine will fall in love with, and traipse happily into the sunset with, someone to whom she in not genetically ( ... )

Reply

lady_ganesh December 30 2009, 02:15:57 UTC
Dude, there was a movie?

Reply

veejane December 30 2009, 02:36:11 UTC
Was there a movie!

There was a 70s movie with bad bewinged blond hair. I believe there may have been ridic peter-pan collars and gigantic neckties. (Honestly, I only saw enough of it to remember that if I ever want to poison somebody, sugared doughnuts are the way to go.)

Reply

lady_ganesh December 30 2009, 02:36:54 UTC
OMFG. How have I lived this long without knowing this?

Reply


catecumen December 30 2009, 00:47:27 UTC
Truly awesomely bad, and surprisingly influential. Interestingly enough, I was just reminded of it by reading a Yuletide story which tried to "fix" it with a crossover from Madeleine L'Engle's Murry family.

Reply

rosefox December 30 2009, 03:05:35 UTC
My face seriously just did the o.O thing. Involuntarily.

Reply

rushthatspeaks December 30 2009, 06:16:08 UTC
It's actually a pretty good fic and I recommend it. The notes say that there is of course no Murry-cest because the author is not V.C. Andrews.

Reply

dormouse_in_tea December 31 2009, 03:30:25 UTC
Mine too. Oh god.

Reply


marzipan_pig December 30 2009, 00:48:39 UTC
I read it pretty young and somehow thought it was based on a true story. Your description here makes it sound creepier than I remember, though of course it came back to me quickly. I had forgotten about the tar, and the urination, and the blood. I think maybe it made me a little (more?) paranoid about the motives of adults/others rather than brought me to any kind of attachment to incest.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up