Leave a comment

veejane December 30 2009, 00:45:17 UTC
1. I knew about the poisoned doughnuts, because I have seen the tail end of the 1970s movie version. (I have never read the book.)

1A. The only reason I know there are sequels is that one time, a couple years ago, snacky sat me down in a B&N and told me in detail the plots of the remaining books. They sounded hilariously terrible.

2. If you have never read a V. C. Andrews novel, you will find that they are all alike. Actually, that's literally true, because she died very early on in her franchise, so the succeeding authors did not have a lot of pointers as to what her audience liked so much. I read just enough of them in highschool to discover the following important axioms:
* The heroine will always have a ridiculous name, usually a noun.
* There are always strange and wealthy relatives waiting in the wings.
* The heroine will be sexually menaced by someone genetically related to her, but whom she does not know at all.
* The heroine will fall in love with, and traipse happily into the sunset with, someone to whom she in not genetically related, a fact often discovered halfway through the novel, although she's always regarded him as a brother and in fact it's possible he changed her diapers. But somehow that stops mattering as soon as they discover they share no genes.

It was upon discerning that last that I said, "V. C. Andrews, you [or your ghost-writers, or indeed the whole audience] need therapy!" and when a 14 y.o. girl can tell you that, you know it is pretty bad.

Reply

lady_ganesh December 30 2009, 02:15:57 UTC
Dude, there was a movie?

Reply

veejane December 30 2009, 02:36:11 UTC
Was there a movie!

There was a 70s movie with bad bewinged blond hair. I believe there may have been ridic peter-pan collars and gigantic neckties. (Honestly, I only saw enough of it to remember that if I ever want to poison somebody, sugared doughnuts are the way to go.)

Reply

lady_ganesh December 30 2009, 02:36:54 UTC
OMFG. How have I lived this long without knowing this?

Reply

giandujakiss December 30 2009, 02:40:23 UTC
It was actually an 80s movie, not 70s. And it's awful. And it doesn't have any incest in it, so it's really pointless. They edited out all the good stuff.

Reply

lady_ganesh December 30 2009, 02:43:47 UTC
...the movie must be about ten minutes long.

Reply

marzipan_pig December 30 2009, 02:50:54 UTC
Oh god ha ha ha!

Reply

veejane December 30 2009, 02:41:28 UTC
A sad lack of bad cable reruns in your youth??

(I am sure it was too racy for independent broadcast stations.)

(Holy crap, because I am a masochist, I looked it up on Netflix: it is in print, it was made in 1987, and it stars Louise Fletcher, aka Nurse Ratched. Although if it makes you feel any better, the search also turned up Aliens in the Attic, which sounds like much more fun.)

Reply

lady_ganesh December 30 2009, 02:44:42 UTC
I bet my husband's seen it. Back when I was watching MST3K he often recognized the films...

(Nurse Ratched! Holy smokes.)

Reply

Netflix has it amberley December 30 2009, 13:21:07 UTC
Netflix has the movie of Flowers in the Attic (1987) for those who care to experience it for themselves.

I think Kaori Yuki would do an unforgettable adaptation to manga!

Reply

Re: Netflix has it lady_ganesh December 30 2009, 14:05:34 UTC
And no doubt improve on the source!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up