tijd
in
puppet_djt
Fake news
Трамп жалуется на "фальшивые опросы": "Any negative polls are fake news, just like the CNN, ABC, NBC polls in the election."
Можно вспомнить, что во время выборов он тоже жаловался на "лживые" опросы, которые давали ему недостаточно процентов.
На финишной дистанции перед выборами менеджеры избирательной кампании Трампа (ныне старшие советники его президентской администрации) ввели жесткую дисциплину: между 20 октября и 9 ноября речи на своих митингах он читал только с телепромптера, живых интервью не давал и в Твиттер ничего сам не писал.
Одно более-менее живое интервью удалось взять 25 октября 2016 на радио знаменитому Рашу Лимбо:
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/10/25/mr_trump_calls_the_show/
Отрывок интервью, где Трамп жалуется на опросы:
RUSH: You’re somebody that’s won everything that you’ve done. What are these assaults…? I don’t think people understand the impact on a family or even an individual, when the kitchen sink is thrown at them as has been thrown at you.
TRUMP: Well, they’ve been vicious. The New York Times, they lie. They lie like I’ve never seen anything. They know they’re lying. One of these guys wrote a story - Rutenberg, Jim Rutenberg, a story. Literally they’ll do whatever they have to do. He practically they insinuated… they’ll lie and tell whatever they have to say. These are vicious people. These are lying people, and, you know, fortunately I can defend myself. I have… What do people do that can’t defend themselves? But I’ll tell you the good news. People know it, people see it, and they say it’s the greatest pile-on in the history of politics and probably long beyond politics, and here’s the bottom line. I think we’re doing really well. You know, they even put phony polls out there, Rush. You take a look at some of these polls; they’re totally phony.
Что же за статью в New York Times написал Jim Rutenberg, что она вызвала такой гнев Трампа? Что именно там было "insinuated"?
Сопоставляя даты, вот эта статья (от 24 октября 2016):
You sure have to hand it to the Russians.
They understand the power of free-flowing information, how it can upend government and politics.
It’s why they don’t let information flow too freely in their own country. And it’s why, if United States intelligence assessments are correct, they have worked so hard to send it roaring through ours.
There is a certain kind of brilliance to the way the Russians are said to have hacked the email accounts of senior Democratic officials and gifted the contents to their BFFs at WikiLeaks.
The Russians seem to be using the United States’ free press - a great symbol of our democracy - against it while setting up an impossible choice for American newsrooms: Run with the stolen and in many cases unverified correspondence and potentially assist an audacious Russian attempt to disrupt a presidential election, or decline to print it and betray their mission to combat the great political fog machine.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/24/business/media/rutenberg-wikileaks-american-democracy.html
Можно вспомнить, что во время выборов он тоже жаловался на "лживые" опросы, которые давали ему недостаточно процентов.
На финишной дистанции перед выборами менеджеры избирательной кампании Трампа (ныне старшие советники его президентской администрации) ввели жесткую дисциплину: между 20 октября и 9 ноября речи на своих митингах он читал только с телепромптера, живых интервью не давал и в Твиттер ничего сам не писал.
Одно более-менее живое интервью удалось взять 25 октября 2016 на радио знаменитому Рашу Лимбо:
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/10/25/mr_trump_calls_the_show/
Отрывок интервью, где Трамп жалуется на опросы:
RUSH: You’re somebody that’s won everything that you’ve done. What are these assaults…? I don’t think people understand the impact on a family or even an individual, when the kitchen sink is thrown at them as has been thrown at you.
TRUMP: Well, they’ve been vicious. The New York Times, they lie. They lie like I’ve never seen anything. They know they’re lying. One of these guys wrote a story - Rutenberg, Jim Rutenberg, a story. Literally they’ll do whatever they have to do. He practically they insinuated… they’ll lie and tell whatever they have to say. These are vicious people. These are lying people, and, you know, fortunately I can defend myself. I have… What do people do that can’t defend themselves? But I’ll tell you the good news. People know it, people see it, and they say it’s the greatest pile-on in the history of politics and probably long beyond politics, and here’s the bottom line. I think we’re doing really well. You know, they even put phony polls out there, Rush. You take a look at some of these polls; they’re totally phony.
Что же за статью в New York Times написал Jim Rutenberg, что она вызвала такой гнев Трампа? Что именно там было "insinuated"?
Сопоставляя даты, вот эта статья (от 24 октября 2016):
You sure have to hand it to the Russians.
They understand the power of free-flowing information, how it can upend government and politics.
It’s why they don’t let information flow too freely in their own country. And it’s why, if United States intelligence assessments are correct, they have worked so hard to send it roaring through ours.
There is a certain kind of brilliance to the way the Russians are said to have hacked the email accounts of senior Democratic officials and gifted the contents to their BFFs at WikiLeaks.
The Russians seem to be using the United States’ free press - a great symbol of our democracy - against it while setting up an impossible choice for American newsrooms: Run with the stolen and in many cases unverified correspondence and potentially assist an audacious Russian attempt to disrupt a presidential election, or decline to print it and betray their mission to combat the great political fog machine.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/24/business/media/rutenberg-wikileaks-american-democracy.html