Leave a comment

Comments 7

crassy October 14 2007, 11:34:06 UTC
Your doctors and possibly your medwife will tell you that it is unsafe to go past 42 weeks, but it is not like your placenta will shrivel up and die because you go that long. There is a woman in, I think, the natural birth community, who went to 45 weeks and has a healthy baby.

I guess it is up to you really, what you want to do. I went almost 42 weeks and had made the decision that I would not be induced but rather go in every other day for tests to see how the baby was doing and go from there. If you do not want to be induced, this would be the way to go. As long as the foetus is doing well, there really isn't any reason to induce, unless, of course, it is what you want to do.

Good luck!

Reply


barefootmomma October 14 2007, 11:56:35 UTC
Well, my daughter was born at 42 weeks, and my midwives were fine with me going beyond that as long as we did non stress tests and an ultrasound or two to check on the placenta and make sure everything is holding up well. The told me of one woman who went to 48 weeks and had a healthy baby with an uncomplicated delivery.

Reply


dawnstar October 14 2007, 14:03:54 UTC
It varies from practice to practice, but I was told at my first birth class that "term" is considered 37-42 weeks. Where I will deliver, they won't let me go beyond 42 weeks, but some places will with close monitoring.

Reply


zoink03 October 14 2007, 20:20:34 UTC
I understand your concern. We have the same due date! Anyways, my doctor told me that he liked to talk about induction after 41 weeks, but if I insisted on natural birth, I could go in for daily NSTs until things progressed naturally. That's the route I'll take if it comes to that. Best of luck to you and your baby!

Reply

phoebia October 14 2007, 21:16:05 UTC
Do you know what you are having? Ours is supposed to be a boy (according to the ultrasound) but will have to wait and see to make sure!

Reply


growyourown October 14 2007, 20:49:31 UTC
My mom claims I went to 44 weeks. Given that dating technology was a little less sophisticated in 1965 than it is now, I'm a little dubious, but docs were also less freaked on this point back then and tended to go with the patient's wishes--partly, I'm guessing, because induction technology was also a lot less developed.

On the other hand, she had to labor in a hospital bed on her back, so it's not like I'm saying that those were the golden days of delivery...

Still, I wasn't enormous, she delivered vaginally, and everyone was healthy and fine.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up