when the snow finally melts . . .

Feb 10, 2010 18:37

.
.
.

. . . are we gonna have a ton of flooding?

weather

Leave a comment

Comments 18

soia February 10 2010, 23:52:15 UTC
I was pondering the same thing earlier today. Pretty sure that will be the next mess we will have to contend with

Reply


sleepsong February 11 2010, 00:01:08 UTC
This is why people in Millvale should invest in inner tubes - they're great for sliding in the snow and for paddling along when they inevitably flood.

(Sorry, people in Millvale!)

Reply

heavyonmymind February 11 2010, 03:52:56 UTC
I live in Millvale (the high ground, near Reserve) and I completely agree. I'm scared everything will flood like crazy and we'll be stuck again.

Reply

jillkatherine February 11 2010, 04:21:33 UTC
Flood plane, represent! *throws gang signs?*

Reply


ariannawyn February 11 2010, 00:04:12 UTC
Yeah, I was thinking about that too. It'll be ok if it stays cold for a while and the snow has a chance to slowly sublimate instead of melt.

Keeping my fingers crossed, since I have friends with a little stream right in front of their house...

Reply


shelaghc February 11 2010, 00:34:06 UTC
Only if it goes to 50 degrees out of the blue.

Reply


dobie February 11 2010, 00:34:37 UTC
Yes... I'm sure we will and here is why (And please, I'm not a math major, so if anyone can check my math, I'd appreciate it ( ... )

Reply

copout February 11 2010, 01:34:07 UTC
This looks good except, where did the "5.05 gallons per cubic foot" figure come from? There are about 7.5 gallons in a cubic foot of water, but a foot of snow generally melts to under an inch of water - maybe an inch for this snow since it was pretty wet/dense.

Reply

dobie February 11 2010, 01:44:20 UTC
I based that on the figure of 220,000 gallons per acre-foot (i.e., one acre of land covered to a depth of 1 foot)

Reply

jillkatherine February 11 2010, 04:26:07 UTC
Although your calculations are correct, it doesn't work my way. See my entry below on sublimation.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up