seriously? Her ignorant attitudes towards addiction, her pathologizing of stay at home mothers, her snotty and willfull ignorance of electoral politics and her hard-on for capitalism? There's plenty of good reasons that she's one of the more consistently frustrating feminists. I'm not sure I would have banned her for that particular exchange. I'd
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
But I do appreciate the vote of confidence!
Reply
You have a "hard-on for capitalism?"
of the more consistently frustrating feminists
That sounds like such a supportive view of feminism. [/sarcasm] Also the point of view of someone who's never heard of some of the wack-jobs who don't even get near that board.
You did break the rule but since it's essentially a stupid rule there's no sense in anyone getting all smug about it.
Reply
Don't ask me about the hard on for capitalism. Maybe if you define a hard on for capitalism as "Sometimes likes buying things," then okay, but...
Reply
There are other issues in the community that frustrate me. Like I was hoping it would be a better place to talk about being in a conservative religion drove me nuts but apparently that edges too close to not being multi-cultural enough because I wasn't a Christian fundamentalist.
And the other day someone got called (not by a mod) on having an icon with "crazy person" in it by someone who "deals with mental illness every day." They cheerfully agreed to change it but I came this close to whipping out my mental illness street cred and telling someone to lighten the hell up. But that never ends well.
Reply
I'm not claiming total innocence here because I know full well that I can be a shit disturber (even if I don't mean to), but that statement? Hard on for capitalism? I have to draw the line.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I'd probably get banned in a week, given the "warnings" I saw.
Reply
Leave a comment