Oz Magi collection & archive

Mar 09, 2012 02:05

Hello, fandom!

I've created an Oz Magi collection on Archive of Our Own, complete with subcollections of submissions by year. If you have Magi fanworks archived on AO3, please add them to the appropriate collection(s). [eta: should you desire to, naturally ( Read more... )

pimp: resources, !admin

Leave a comment

Comments 6

jean_c_pepper March 9 2012, 09:33:13 UTC
We don't HAVE to archive out stuff there, do we? I have NOT posted my Oz Magi story to Ao3 and I don't want it posted to Ao3 You aren't moving the stories are you? Do I need to delete it?

Reply

trillingstar March 9 2012, 13:41:28 UTC
No, no, and no.

Reply

jean_c_pepper March 9 2012, 20:05:45 UTC
*deep breath* Excellent. The main reason I am not moving it is that while I LOVED it and it appeared my recipient liked it and a couple of other people liked it, it's such an OBSCURE crossover that I think it's found pretty much all the audience it's going to get. And by having it just posted at Oz_Magi, I think that makes it very easy for those that might be looking for Dean Winters/Kirk Acevedo crossovers will find it.

Reply


marythefan March 12 2012, 00:12:38 UTC
Am I being technologically incompetent? I've managed to add all my other stories to the appropriate Magi-year collections, but when I try to add "Misericordia" to 2004, it won't autofill "Oz Magi 2004" ... then when I type it in manually, I get a message that the story can't be added to the collection because AO3 can't find a collection titled that.

And yet, when I GO TO the collection, I can see it exists.

Why is AO3 THWARTING me?

(Thanks for setting these up, btw - you rock!)

Reply

trillingstar March 12 2012, 02:51:56 UTC
No! Well, maybe? LOL. dustandroses had the same problem with the 2004 collection, and I'd hoped that AO3 just needed a couple of days to, idk, catch up with the new stuff. But that does not seem to be the case, so I'll file a help ticket and get back to you. Sorry about that.

Thank you! :x

Reply

trillingstar March 14 2012, 10:42:00 UTC
CS assures me that the problem has been manually fixed (overall it's a known bug!). LMK if it is still being buggy.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up