Description: In authors ranging from Heinlein to Macleod, Spinrad to Cordwainer Smith, the revolution is glorified - sometimes a violent one, sometimes (but far more rarely) a peaceful one. How do we avoid making the same errors of glorifying violence and hero worship when coming at things from a revolutionary perspective in fiction? (Some people
(
Read more... )
Comments 89
(The comment has been removed)
I so wish I went to "Colonialism in Space" or "Mixed-Race Characters" instead.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
The Pol Pot comment was just completely a WTF?! moment, but the part that really got to me was Kincaid's remarks on India, just because at least the entire room seemed to collectively think "WTF?" at the Pol Pot comment, whereas no one commented on the India one and Kincaid was obviously trying to be non-inflammatory.
Reply
'Course, and unsurprisingly, he's just a symptom of the problem and not an exception, but given the way people in general react, I have a slight fear that people will focus so much on how stooopid he was and not look at the wider implications of the general panel.
(Your write up is admirable, however, in attempting to explicitly state the plethora of systemic problems you saw, so possibly that will forestall that issue.)
Reply
Also, wasn't this panel supposed to focus on fiction? The only references I can remember being made to any fiction, was L. Timmel Duchamp, to her own fiction.
I'm at work now, but will probably be more elaborate when I type up my own panel report. Mostly, I was disappointed because I attended another panel that Kinkaid and Nakashima-Brown were both on, and enjoyed it immensely.
Reply
But yes, I was immensely frustrated by the panel on many levels, but mostly by the racism and the colonialist attitudes.
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
I have no other words! Just... WTF?!
Reply
Leave a comment