Yup, I went to see this movie yesterday. Here's my thoughts:
(PS: might be SPOILERS ahead....)
I understand Kapur's concept, and it might have worked. But his hangup for visual splendor really kills the story and emotional content.
First, the SYMBOLISM. Big, grand, ol'fashioned symbolism. Each time we saw the "Evil Catholic Plotters" they
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
I didn't dislike the film as much as you did apparently - I thought it was okay until the last part, when I was finally swept away by the splendour and symbolism and (very) grand music. And by Clive Owen's handsomeness :) But what on earth was the deal with the horses in the water?!
I totally agree that the red dye was overkill, so much that it was quite silly really - I kept expecting the red cloth to be relevant to the plot at some point, since it was shown so much!
Reply
Reply
And the white horse as representing pure and innocent England escaping the clutches of evil under impossible odds - very good :))
Reply
/Eva
Reply
If I were to guess what she was thinking with that costume.... Well, Elizabeth is probably meant to symbolize the sea (the sea and sailing is the theme of the scene). Byrne seldom make costume sketches, instead she gathers visions in the shape of cut-outs, fabrics and references*. Which might explain why her costumes are always such a mish-mash..... (*I have this info from the documentary of the POTO movie costumes, which she also designed).
But who decided that historical (correct) costumes can't be allegorical? I mean, it's not like we invented allegorical dressing in the 20. th century..... And that blue dress is really poorly made. It fits badly, and looks like a cheap Jane Austen costume from the 70's or something. There are more costumes like that in the Elizabeth movie, be warned....
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment