Yet another leftist history lesson brought to you by reality's liberal bias.

Nov 25, 2010 14:44

The Pilgrims Were ... Socialists?Ah, Thanksgiving. A celebration regardless of creed; a time for all Americans to come together after a divisive election year ( Read more... )

tea bagging, history, lies, factcheck, thanksgiving, holidays

Leave a comment

Comments 45

chimbleysweep November 25 2010, 20:51:06 UTC
My favorite pilgrim is Humility Cooper. She outlived her whole family, except for her cousin, before she turned one, and then she was shipped back to England. Go gurl~

Reply

filbypott November 25 2010, 20:53:05 UTC
"Humility Cooper" is an awesome name, not gonna lie.

Reply

chimbleysweep November 25 2010, 20:58:01 UTC
They had some amazing names. The Brewsters had the corner on the market. Love, Patience, Fear, Wrestling (and Jonathan).

These are things I remember from 5th grade.

Reply

everythingonit November 25 2010, 21:08:56 UTC
Wait...

FEAR?!

Awesome.

Reply


filbypott November 25 2010, 20:52:38 UTC
I'm baffled by any attempt to link the Pilgrims to socialism, since they were the direct descendants of Cromwell's Puritan movement, which eventually (IMO) gave rise to modern American conservatism.

Reply

tmlforsyth November 25 2010, 21:43:32 UTC
Ayatollah Cromwell seemed more authoritarian and would probably consider Adam Smith as a dangerous non-conformist. He didn't abolish England's ban on Jews, but he was bright enough to look the other way, and his rule did some good for England, but he was a humorless prig and the Brits were very happy to have the Stuarts back.

I could see Cromwell backing socialism as long as it was part of Puritan theocracy and excluded other socialist theocrats, like Jesuits. Oliver would naturally be very anti-social democracy, but he's also be just as contemptuous of libertarianism.

Reply

filbypott November 25 2010, 22:04:56 UTC
...yeah, that has the ring of truth to it.

Even so, I still think of Cromwell as the progenitor of American social conservatism, if not fiscal conservatism.

Reply

tmlforsyth November 26 2010, 01:18:46 UTC
I'll give you social conservatism, especially considering it's New England roots, though I always thought the fiscal conservatism was more based in classical liberalism. Granted was a radical regicidal rebel in his day, but other Puritans were even more radical.

Granted, the definition of fiscal conservative has shifted as populists like Glen Beck claim the libertarian mantle.

I've always found capitalism more radical than socialism, as socialism has certain roots in very ancient societies, while individualism is a more recent concept. Now corporatism may have older roots, too.

Reply


capitalism? nothingmuch November 25 2010, 20:56:15 UTC
Finally, the governor of the colony, William Bradford, abolished this system and gave each household a parcel of land. With private property to call their own, the Pilgrims were suddenly very industrious

So where do I sign up for my free parcel of land so I can be a well-off capitalist like the Pilgrims?

Reply

Re: capitalism? rex_dart November 25 2010, 21:02:29 UTC
Try 1889, but you're going to have to race everyone to Oklahoma for it.

Reply

Re: capitalism? nothingmuch November 25 2010, 21:05:51 UTC
lol

Reply

Re: capitalism? hinoema November 26 2010, 08:30:02 UTC
Yeah, isn't that government handouts? Welfare!

Reply


subversive_kiwi November 25 2010, 21:13:15 UTC


NEGL, I can't think about Thanksgiving without breaking out this scene from Addams Family Values.

Reply

fynoda November 25 2010, 21:27:52 UTC
I came here just to post this.

Reply

dreammeanyway November 25 2010, 21:29:12 UTC
YES.

Reply

filbypott November 25 2010, 22:09:52 UTC
(...is that Tony Shalhoub singing "Macho Man" at the end?)

Reply


lidane November 25 2010, 22:12:35 UTC
OK. So these imbeciles are saying that the Pilgrims were socialist but turned from their evil ways, and this douche from Missouri says that the Pilgrims came here to escape socialism:

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/11/25/todd-akin-pilgrims-socialism/

Teabaggers -- plz to make up your mind on which bit of historical revisionism you're going to follow. Kthxbai.

Reply

filbypott November 25 2010, 22:15:11 UTC
I just think it's incredibly disingenuous to talk about capitalism or socialism in the context of the early 1700s, before anyone heard of Adam Smith and Karl Marx's grandfather wasn't even born yet.

Reply

lidane November 25 2010, 22:26:30 UTC
Of course it's disingenuous. However, you can't reason with these idiots. They're so thoroughly indoctrinated in this right-wing echo chamber version of history that pointing out facts like capitalism and socialism not actually existing yet just doesn't compute.

Besides, who cares about facts when you're trying to make a political point? =P

Reply

filbypott November 25 2010, 23:06:58 UTC
Sad but true. :/

Reply


Leave a comment

Up