Just a reminder, the National Review is still shit.

[beoweasel]

Top Conservative Publication: Shooting Occurred Because Women Ran The School

If there were fewer women and more “male aggression” in Sandy Hook Elementary School, the massacre there never would have taken place, according to a contribution to a leading conservative magazine.

National Review, whose in-house editorial suggested Newtown was the

Comments

[sandstorm]

or even some of the huskier 12-year-old boys, had converged on Lanza.

...

Wasn't he coming at people with an assault rifle? I doubt anyone could get close enough to tackle him.

[kyra_neko_rei]

Someone couldn't, in fact. The principal died rushing him with that very intent.

[meimichan]

Already been posted.

[recorded]

TY!

[shipperx]

Except there were men there, and the yahoos who wrote this just went with their preconceptions rather than even a cursory look at the facts.

[amber_protocol]

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.

[phamos818]

There were indeed men there, including a "male janitor" who didn't waste time chucking buckets at a semiautomatic rifle but instead ran through the school to warn people.

[kyra_neko_rei]

But in general, a feminized setting is a setting in which helpless passivity is the norm.

Gee, maybe she should stop advocating for a gender-role standard which encourages (and sometimes enforces) "helpless passivity" as the norm in "feminized settings," and start advocating for feminism which encourages and enables courage, assertiveness, strength, and decisiveness by women.