The image below has been making the rounds on my Facebook. It originally popped up on my feed on the page for “It’s Okay to Be Takei”, and has been posted around by about five or six other people. Images travel fast on Facebook.
And yes, I agree with you. I sort of saw it and made a face -- not really being able to articulate why it rubbed me the wrong way but the article pretty much hit the nail on the head.
The version of this I saw first just had the fictional women characters; I think the full version is much more problematic (even though I couldn't put my finger on why until I read the article).
And I love the examples of badass real women in the geek culture.
Same; I think my husband linked it to me, and it only had the bottom row. I rather liked it, though when I reblogged it I said something about wanting rayguns for my Barbies, because I loved my Barbies when I was a girl. No reason I couldn't have both. :)
everything about this image sucks, idek where to start. there are an endless amount of wank-fodder women characters in sci-fi and geek fandom that would make even the most dismal ~real women pop culture~ role models look downright conservative and righteous.
really enjoying the lack of beyonce, emma watson, etc type figures in the first row
also i'm just straight up perplexed by the inclusion of kat von d, gaga, and kstew with snookie and kim k. just apples and oranges, not that oranges deserve the kind of criticism they seem to be getting here anyway.
While I think there's a couple of problems here, I also think that there's a valid statement being made here when contrasting both cultures. Geek culture isn't any less misogynistic than pop culture, it only manifests differently. Instead of being overtly misogynistic (especially when you think of the Bella character in Twilight being absolutely useless and a cardboard cut-out of a teenage girl), geek culture can be much more subtle about it by setting up this dynamic where you get slightly more rounded characters in exchange for getting to see them, in the end, go the route of the damsel in distress. It's like a delayed gratification or something.
As far as real women being held up to fictional women, I'd be willing to bet that all of the reality star women (and even Lady Gaga) present separate personalities for public consumption. Still a problem in the context of this macro, but I guess I don't think of their TV show personalities as extensions of their everyday personalities. So that pings me less as being a problem.
Comments 53
It seemed vaguely problematic when it popped up wherever I saw it but I couldn't really put my finger on what I thought was wrong with it.
Reply
And yes, I agree with you. I sort of saw it and made a face -- not really being able to articulate why it rubbed me the wrong way but the article pretty much hit the nail on the head.
Reply
And I love the examples of badass real women in the geek culture.
Reply
Reply
Reply
really enjoying the lack of beyonce, emma watson, etc type figures in the first row
also i'm just straight up perplexed by the inclusion of kat von d, gaga, and kstew with snookie and kim k. just apples and oranges, not that oranges deserve the kind of criticism they seem to be getting here anyway.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
As far as real women being held up to fictional women, I'd be willing to bet that all of the reality star women (and even Lady Gaga) present separate personalities for public consumption. Still a problem in the context of this macro, but I guess I don't think of their TV show personalities as extensions of their everyday personalities. So that pings me less as being a problem.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment