In case you haven't heard, Eli Federman is the new disgrace of Lubavitch.
Yes he is.
He is a horrible, evil moser who is also a selfish, attention-seeking, destructive self-hating Jew. He should leave Crown Heights and move far away and take his horrible modern and immodest family with him. He should do teshuva and beg forgiveness from the Rebbe
(
Read more... )
Comments 21
You should be so lucky.
Reply
Reply
It's kinda catchy.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Seriously, one of the strange and most ironic points that jumped out at me was how many of the commentators insisted that this was a religious issues for rabbinic authorities which should be kept far out of the secular sphere...even though from what I've heard, they serve as a liaison to the secular world and government programs.
Perhaps the real scandal is that government officials have totally cooperated with the existing structure, putting votes ahead of compliance with the Constitution. After all, rabbis are louder than divorced mothers and widows at election time....
JRKmommy
Reply
Reply
Reply
In Canada, discrimination on the basis of gender (or race or religion or any other similar grounds) is unconstitutional unless it's part of program to remedy the effects of discrimination. Is there anything similar in the US Constitution?
Also - what does the Crown Heights council get government funds for? Do they have a role in administering/distributing food stamps and social housing, or do they merely assist people in filling out paperwork? It was hard to tell from the website.
Are community councils common in other areas, or is this a Crown Heights creation?
Is funding such a council discretionary or required? Can the government legally say, "No, we are not willing to give funding to an organization that doesn't allow women to vote on its make-up".
Will discuss more on Friday or Sunday - need to get ready now.
JRKmommy
Reply
You say Mr. Federman is a disgrace and should be ashamed.
I read a NYT article that included not only Mr. Federman, but Mrs. Federman as well. Why aren't you mentioning her questionable repute for daring to allow her picture in a paper where people may see it?
(insert sarcasm)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment