I can’t help but think that if they just debuted someone in LSF that could sing, none of this would have happened… I really do feel like the live encore drama was the first domino that fell (re: anti-Hybe sentiment)
shes sung an opera song, but afaik she wasnt trained as one. she does have an amazing voice when they actually let her do vocals, same with chaewon. im pretty sure garam was intended as a vocalist too, so theyd have three vocalists and three dancers, but whoops
What I don’t understand is the court ruled that mhj did shady shit to betray hybe, but that doesn’t count as a breach of trust of ADOR. But like, if someone was trying to bring down hybe they would also bring down ADOR because they’re linked, same way it would affect pledis and source etc. I don’t really see how they can say what she was doing to hybe and their reputation wasn’t also going to cause backlash to ADOR.
Ultimately she’s brought herself some more time but she’ll still end up being kicked out. I just hope she gets taken away from new jeans and kpop so she can’t do anymore damage to them or any other minor idols.
That's not how Company law works. A parent company and its subsidiaries are separate legal entities with separate legal liabilities, taxation, governance etc - meaning, according to the law, they're not linked to one another. MHJ bringing down Hybe is not a breach of trust of Ador because Ador is a distinct entity.
Hybe's claims would stick if they didn't operate under a multilabel system. Besides MHJ harming Hybe is not prohibited in her contract (only the harm of Ador is prohibited) so it's a wrap.
Can I ask then (sorry if you don’t actually know I’m just assuming you’re a company law whiz!), could a parent company put into its subsidiaries contracts to not go against the parent company or not publicly attack them or whatever the official legal term would be? Or is that not possible because legally they’re not related? If they can, well hybe made a big mistake not putting that clause in her ADOR contract haha.
The term should be "bottom-up liability". I'm not 100% sure Hybe could have put that into a contract (I'm not versed in SK company law, just general company law) but given all the other dubious clauses in MHJ's contract, I'm going to say yes they could've. They probably didn't because they already have a 80% stake so they thought they had MHJ and Ador under control.
Comments 72
Reply
Reply
shes sung an opera song, but afaik she wasnt trained as one. she does have an amazing voice when they actually let her do vocals, same with chaewon. im pretty sure garam was intended as a vocalist too, so theyd have three vocalists and three dancers, but whoops
Reply
Reply
( ... )
Reply
fire them all
Reply
Reply
Ultimately she’s brought herself some more time but she’ll still end up being kicked out. I just hope she gets taken away from new jeans and kpop so she can’t do anymore damage to them or any other minor idols.
Reply
Hybe's claims would stick if they didn't operate under a multilabel system. Besides MHJ harming Hybe is not prohibited in her contract (only the harm of Ador is prohibited) so it's a wrap.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment