Hollywood’s Biggest Stars Offer To Kick In $150M Over Three Years In Dues To Help End Actors Strike

Oct 19, 2023 18:11


Hollywood’s Biggest Stars Offer To Kick In $150M Over Three Years In Dues To Help End Actors Strike Stalemate https://t.co/u75vnayyKM
- Deadline Hollywood (@DEADLINE) October 19, 2023

source

Yesterday a group of big Hollywood stars including George Clooney, Emma Stone, Ben Affleck, Tyler Perry and Scarlett Johansson met with SAG-AFTRA

their ( Read more... )

george clooney, strike

Leave a comment

Comments 45

genbu_no_miko24 October 19 2023, 17:53:56 UTC
Good, whatever helps.

Reply


mary_pickforded October 19 2023, 17:58:20 UTC

quinnmorgendorf October 19 2023, 17:59:13 UTC

George Clooney, Emma Stone, and Ben Affleck all have movies that they want to campaign for awards for, so this makes sense.

It sucks that the studios would have to make even fewer concessions though.

Reply

eronanke October 19 2023, 18:02:28 UTC
>George Clooney, Emma Stone, and Ben Affleck all have movies that they want to campaign for awards for, so this makes sense.

I'm confused - do you mean they generally want to look good in the press? Because union dues increases wouldn't affect the current negotiations with the AMPTP. And the other SAG-AFTRA members aren't a voting block for awards...

Reply

quinnmorgendorf October 19 2023, 18:16:21 UTC
No, I mean they want to promote their movies and they can't as long as SAG is striking. These changes, particularly "a bottom up residual structure. Meaning the top of the call sheet would be the last to collect residuals not the first," seem like an attempt to appease the SAG-AFTRA negotiating committee so that they'll be more amenable to agreeing to whatever AMPTP is offering.

Reply

eronanke October 19 2023, 18:33:00 UTC
>seem like an attempt to appease the SAG-AFTRA negotiating committee so that they'll be more amenable to agreeing to whatever AMPTP is offering ( ... )

Reply


nemophilist October 19 2023, 17:59:57 UTC
good! ♥

Reply


eronanke October 19 2023, 18:00:36 UTC
Fundamentally, I would ask why there was a cap ever in place? The unions of acting, directing, writing, etc, are what allows for their work to continue. Everyone, from top to bottom, according to their means.

Reply

archersangel October 19 2023, 21:44:38 UTC
Probably the actors making more, when the rule was made, complained about having to pay more money.

Reply

eronanke October 20 2023, 11:14:20 UTC
Naturally, but I'd love to know how the rank-and-file members were convinced to allow it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up