Leave a comment

Comments 94

anna_mated September 3 2021, 08:17:01 UTC
Not every celebrity has to be an activist. But it’s not ‘activism’ to choose not to wear a brand, you just wear something else and don’t give those designers a platform.

They’re all getting paid $ to wear it and that’s what I judge.

Reply


ebenetwo September 3 2021, 08:22:37 UTC
Anya's lipstick

someone lied to her several times

Reply


lunaserenade September 3 2021, 08:23:17 UTC
Pedro looks like a fucking snack. 😍😍

Reply


genbu_no_miko24 September 3 2021, 08:39:01 UTC
Realistically I don't really care. It's not a requirement for me that celebs be political or activists cause thats not what they signed up for. If they are thats fine and some point given the nature of the industry they'll contradict themselves for it.

At best I just make a mental note of it.

Aww Yalitzia looks pretty in her dress!

Reply


betgfm September 3 2021, 08:56:10 UTC
I mean if Chanel with it’s Nazi history is fine then D&G bouncing back is no surprise.

Reply

purrple_267 September 3 2021, 11:41:28 UTC
There are a couple of decades between Chanel's Nazi past and DG's recent 'past'.

I do get weirded out when people are fannish over Coco herself or consider her their icon - that she was a Nazi agent is literally in the wikipedia, it's impossible to miss.

Reply

tanglespiders September 3 2021, 17:39:53 UTC
Also, Chanel left France right after liberation, she didn't reopen her fashion house until the 50s (with money from the Wertheimers!), and she was not popular in France at that point. Her support came from Brits and Americans, who were generally more forgiving of collabos.

Obviously D&G are not as bad as Nazi agents, but Americans being quick to forgive fancy racists is pretty on brand for us.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


Leave a comment

Up