Isn't it odd that the only forms of "birth control" anti-choicers will tolerate -- abstinence and NFP -- just so happen to be the only forms of "birth control" that leave women totally unprotected from impregnation by rape?
Considering the recent efforts to
deny abortion coverage to impoverished rape victims in the US Congress, the "
Conceived in
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
And in doing so have gone back to "the good ol' days."
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Very, and trust me...it was odd too when I was pro-life. As a lifer, I thought contraception was good because it prevented unwanted pregnancy which would lead to abortion. And while I wasn't politically active as a lifer, when I was on the fence, I asked those that were anti-abortion about why they were against contraception because that left a woman vulnerable to rape. They *never* gave me a descent answer. It was always something like "It's a part of God's plan" or some moronic response.
it's starting to get really obvious that these people care a whole lot more about subjugating women -- by force if necessary -- than protecting fetuses.
I've been thinking that since January when congress first thought about redefining rape
How long before they start actively encouraging men to go out and rape for the pro-life ( ... )
Reply
Sometimes I think younger generations are so comfortable with their right to choose that they don't realize how close this country is coming to removing it.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Leave a comment