Final thought for the day...

Sep 02, 2008 23:58

Is it better to strive for grand goals and only partly achieve them, or strive for small goals and succeed entirely?

philosophy

Leave a comment

Comments 9

(The comment has been removed)

ginasketch September 3 2008, 06:47:33 UTC
iawtc

Reply


takhisis September 3 2008, 00:57:07 UTC
The first is more important for a lifetime. The second is more important for day-to-day sanity. I strive for a combination of both. :)

Reply


seidhepriest September 3 2008, 01:49:51 UTC
Ensure fulfilment of required notions coming from within. Without judging. Then they won't appear as either grand or small.

Reply


pmp September 3 2008, 06:12:02 UTC
Or is it better not to strive for anything and just be happy you're not dead yet....

Reply

ginasketch September 3 2008, 06:44:51 UTC
No.

Reply


anonymous September 3 2008, 21:54:51 UTC
Stop thinking. Live.

Reply

nadriel September 3 2008, 22:00:06 UTC
Oooh, hallo again Mr Anonymous. Still making with the Philosophy-Lite (tm) statements, I see :-).

Oh, and to respond, aside from being something of a trite statement, quite often when people stop thinking, it's shortly followed by them stopping living. Darwinism's a bitch...

Reply

ginasketch September 4 2008, 09:27:43 UTC
Seriously.

Tis why I said "no" to the question posed "isn't it better to just strive for nothing and just be happy you're alive?"

I'd argue that if you never strive for anything again then you are already dead.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up