Verdict: 10,000 BC Sucked.

Jul 01, 2008 19:51

You all know that I'm not a movie snob, right? So when I say that 10,000 BC really, really sucked, I mean it really, really sucked ( Read more... )

movie reviews, media, bad reviews

Leave a comment

Comments 92

pariahsdream July 2 2008, 01:19:32 UTC
Yeah....I saw it when the power went out at my last apartment at the $1 theater. I am VERY glad I didn't pay more than that for it. It was better than Bloodrayne (which I did pay to see via Netflix and wish I hadn't).

It had the SIMPLEST story EVAH. They stole his girl so he took her back. The end.

His mentor dude was hot at least.

Reply

naamah_darling July 2 2008, 01:29:16 UTC
MAN. You know the revolting mix of bug guts and blood that's inside a tick that you pull off a dog's ass? Bloodrayne was that bad.

HORRIBLE.

Reply

pariahsdream July 2 2008, 02:07:19 UTC
It was that. Had a hot sex scene though (I personally have never thought to have kinky sex up against a moving cage door but when the opportunity presents itself...)

Also, I am looking through your older movie reviews (specifically the bad ones because you are, if nothing else, the best when you are snarking) and you and I go into movies for the same thing, entertainment pure and simple. ;)

Reply

Speaking of bad movie nookie. lots42 July 2 2008, 06:07:12 UTC
There's this bizarre Dolph Lundgren movie where the female sidekick decides to seduce him by rubbing cactus juice all over her naked bewbies.

Didn't see the point. She's hot. He's a guy. A simple shirt removal is enough.

But I do want to know this movie now. It's awfully bad but the sidekick is hot.

Reply


zombiegoat July 2 2008, 01:34:40 UTC
Not even any Sleestaks, eh? Too bad.

Reply


return2zero July 2 2008, 01:59:25 UTC
I was waiting to see that when I'm drunk. VERY drunk.

Reply

naamah_darling July 2 2008, 06:36:25 UTC
I think inebriation would improve it significantly, as would company.

Reply

return2zero July 2 2008, 10:01:15 UTC
Thus the MST3K-ability of the flick, eh??

Reply

naamah_darling July 2 2008, 11:11:01 UTC
Yup. It's not something to watch alone, sober. Why would you hurt yourself like that? Unless you like pain, in which case you could just slam your thumb in a drawer and then go watch something GOOD.

Reply


dulcimeoww July 2 2008, 02:02:59 UTC
Hope you don't mind, that last line tickled me so much that I borrowed it for the random funny thing section on our site. I'll take it down if you prefer.

Reply

naamah_darling July 2 2008, 06:36:57 UTC
Don't mind! For a bad moment there, I thought I'd spelled "recommend" wrong, though.

Reply


EArly on dragonet2 July 2 2008, 02:13:50 UTC
I saw a trailer with mammoths..... galloping. Like a horse. I thought it was a brain glitch so I kept staring at the trailer and they showed it again because it's 'action.' I was gobsmacked.

I'll catch it on TV. when I can bead or do something else.

Reply

Re: EArly on naamah_darling July 2 2008, 06:42:51 UTC
Yeah, my brain kind of . . . cocked its metaphorical head and stuck its tongue out. I've seen footage of elephants running. It didn't look like that.

Reply

Re: EArly on mistressbanshee July 2 2008, 15:36:01 UTC
Yeah, I watched this movie a few days ago and... that's the FIRST thing that made me blink at my screen and make faces.

Elephants don't gallop, they don't really "run" in the full sense of the term (they always have at least one foot on the ground).

The thing is, I can't really figure out why they didn't use the elephant's natural gait for the movie, because in my opinion it's quite a bit scarier-looking.

Reply

Re: EArly on naamah_darling July 2 2008, 19:57:45 UTC
Yeah, it's like one prolonged STOMP.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up