i blamed you for my freezing and forgetting

Sep 25, 2009 09:41

I've got a fuckton of work to get done today, but there are two things I couldn't stop thinking about re: last night's SPN:

spoilers )

that sam-i-am, tv: supernatural, the boy/boy melodrama

Leave a comment

Comments 27

withdiamonds September 25 2009, 13:53:24 UTC
I think Jane Lynch would be the most awesome God ever.

Reply

musesfool September 25 2009, 13:58:11 UTC
She really, really would. And man, Sam and Dean would be yes, ma'am'ing all over the place, and you know I enjoy that.

Reply

grandiose666 September 25 2009, 19:51:47 UTC
i third this. indeed.

Reply


tigriswolf September 25 2009, 14:02:06 UTC
Oh, if they can't get JDM as God, then I would LOVE to see Queen Latifah do it.

Reply

musesfool September 25 2009, 14:07:54 UTC
She would be awesome! Sadly, I doubt they can afford her.

Reply

zillah975 September 25 2009, 14:52:12 UTC
YES PLS. She would be a terrific God.

Reply


zillah975 September 25 2009, 15:00:42 UTC
I immediately thought Richards when he said Keith. ♥

I mean, "this whole industry runs on absent fathers" was to me less about the sex industry and more about hunting (in the text) and the show (metatextually).

Thank you for this spin on Dean's otherwise utterly idiotic reaction. I won't bore you with the various reasons it left me so slack-jawed, but it's nice to see a reason that makes some sense, even if it does kind of require a sideways reading of the scene.

I'm still trying to scrub the end of last night's ep off my skin. Dean's whole "I'm happy now, like really happy. And you and me are having so much fun now that my albatross of a brother is gone," just...ick. I buy that he's meant to be trying to convince himself, but Jensen just played it too believably for me, and I just feel all...idek. Yucky. Though I did like Castiel's kind of horrified look when he said it. At least, I think that's what it was. I'll have to re-watch, but did he look kind of horrified to you?

Reply

musesfool September 28 2009, 15:37:43 UTC
Thank you for this spin on Dean's otherwise utterly idiotic reaction.

yeah, just as it was, it was a completely appalling remark, but I really do think it was meant to refer to how people become hunters when their families are ripped apart, and how the show started with an absent father, and is coming around full circle to that theme this season.

I buy that he's meant to be trying to convince himself, but Jensen just played it too believably for me, and I just feel all...idek. Yucky. Though I did like Castiel's kind of horrified look when he said it. At least, I think that's what it was. I'll have to re-watch, but did he look kind of horrified to you?

Yeah, I think Castiel looked a little appalled there, but I also think Dean was lying - I think he certainly felt relief, and I think he had fun, but I think it was also a recreation of fun he'd had with Sam, and with slotting Castiel in Sam's role.

Reply


tsuki_no_bara September 25 2009, 15:00:55 UTC
queen latifah would be a fabulous god. or jane lynch. and jane lynch is like six feet tall - if she wore heels she could look dean in the eye. heee.

also, yes, "this whole industry runs on absent fathers" was totally a commentary on the show. it really is about sons (and daughters, if you want to include jo) and their missing dads, isn't it.

Reply

musesfool September 28 2009, 15:38:34 UTC
yeah, Jane Lynch as god would command serious respect, and not a little fear, which I would enjoy.

"this whole industry runs on absent fathers" was totally a commentary on the show. it really is about sons (and daughters, if you want to include jo) and their missing dads, isn't it.

Yeah, that's how I took it.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

musesfool September 28 2009, 16:17:42 UTC
Will there be sunflowers, do you think?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up