My overall aim for 2006 was to read less, but better. Going by a very imprecise scale (looking at everything I read in 2005 and everything I read in 2006 and rating each one as good, bad or indifferent) I appear to have achieved the first aim quite well and the second, less so. I read 2/3 as many books in 2006 as 2005. However, I rated 75% of these
(
Read more... )
Comments 5
What is this other kind of "history" of which you speak? Surely there is no "history" but that which contains Nazis?
Reply
Yes, yes, yes.
And also, yes.
Reply
As per our conversation, I've read 20 books this year, of which 5 were fiction. That's a bit rubbish really. My timing may be slightly out (I don't date the dates I finish things, I'm going by the fact I remember reading Reich's The Cancer Biopathy at Catherine's parents last year, and I've read 20 since then - this did take me awhile to finish though, thus inaccuracy.
This year, I intend to:
Read more books! Including:
Homer - The Iliad
Pynchon - Against the Day (both on bedside table at present)
Reich's stuff that I've not read (loads of it)
Also, do you think Metamorphsis might make a good book club read? I've read it, but didn't get a huge amount out of it last time. Shared analysis might help.
Reply
Reply
I checked my total for last year and, not counting rereads or work books, it looks like I read 33 books of which 12 were children's books and 7 non-fiction (mostly natural history). Total is a bit rubbish but since it includes the Baroque Cycle and excludes such mammoth tomes as The Making of the English Middle Class I'm not too perturbed... Best book - not sure - possibly The Mouse and His Child? Book enjoyed least - On Beauty. Most disappointing - The Pinhoe Egg (sadly - reads like slightly off-key fanfic).
Losing Nelson is tip-top, btw.
Reply
Leave a comment