Leave a comment

Comments 23

prozacpark June 1 2011, 02:53:45 UTC
Um, what century are we living in? I'm remembering all the romantic period articles on how reading gave women psychological disorders. And how it was DANGEROUS.

Romance novels are a response to patriarchy, and of course, instead of seeing the PATRIARCHY as a problem, we'll go ahead and blame women somehow. Oh, world. Fail less.

Reply

rosehiptea June 1 2011, 03:01:12 UTC
I'm remembering The Female Quixote.

instead of seeing the PATRIARCHY as a problem, we'll go ahead and blame women somehow

So much this.

Reply


dangermousie June 1 2011, 03:21:38 UTC
I agree with the article insofar it supports a broad proposition that the media you consume, especially if you consume a lot of it, does affect your view on the world/expectations/even morals ( ... )

Reply

thinking_lotus June 1 2011, 12:58:24 UTC
You are going to be a different person if you read a lot of 19th-century German philosophers than if you don't - this isn't any different from the effect romance novels would have (though obviously the changes produced would be somewhat different).

Certainly the period of my life in which I read ALL of Henry James colored my outlook on life, and probably not for the better, either.

Reply


reynardine June 1 2011, 03:22:13 UTC
I'm still trying to get past the suggestion that reading self-help books together is somehow going to improve my marriage. :-P

Reply

fairest1 June 1 2011, 05:58:25 UTC
How about "Let's laugh at this article together"?

Reply


fairest1 June 1 2011, 05:57:58 UTC
*reads article* So. Wouldn't it be saner to not stop them from reading it outright but move them to romances (and for dudes, porn) that portrayed healthy, happy relationships? I'm not going to say 'realistic' because that usually ends up being interpreted as 'majorly screwed up'.

Reply


thinking_lotus June 1 2011, 12:54:14 UTC
yes, Sei Shonagon would SO have been a blogger if the internet had existed in Heian Japan.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up