Integration Problem

Jan 28, 2009 15:58

My physical chemistry class has turned into a math class, and it's been a few too many years since I've taken calculus for me to be sure of myself.

Here's what I'm trying to integrate followed by the solution given by the Mathematica Online Integrator.


Read more... )

integration

Leave a comment

Comments 10

ex_beshenov January 28 2009, 21:40:40 UTC
The right answer is a^3/4.

Reply

bubbblybubbbles January 28 2009, 23:58:25 UTC
Woohoo! I guess my skills are not so rusty :) Thanks for the help!

Reply

ex_beshenov January 29 2009, 00:05:50 UTC
?

It's the answer you get from the Mathematica integrator.

Reply

bubbblybubbbles January 29 2009, 00:39:38 UTC
Oh wait a second; I misread your answer. Apparently both my math and reading skills need some work :) Thank you, again!

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

sans_galois January 28 2009, 22:39:58 UTC
Natural number e?

Reply

bubbblybubbbles January 29 2009, 00:00:37 UTC
Ahhh. I've never been allowed to use math software for homework before, so I know nothing about its quirks. This is good to know since every function in PChem seems to have "e" in it. Thanks for the help and the good info!

Reply


nevermore_x January 29 2009, 00:15:06 UTC
I get a^3/4, similar to the first commentor and the result you obtained from Mathematica.
But, I have not done such an integral in quite a long time...

Reply

bubbblybubbbles January 29 2009, 00:41:57 UTC
Yeah, I haven't done these in a long time either. It's too easy to lose constants with so many integrations by parts. Thanks for the help! I kind of figured the computer was right...

Reply

nevermore_x January 29 2009, 02:31:12 UTC
Indeed, but I rarely rely on technology alone. If you were still having trouble, I would suggest working backward from the correst result.

Reply


kray_zemli January 29 2009, 06:27:32 UTC
Mathematica solution is correct :-)

You may somehow use the fact (that is derived of integration by parts), that integral (0..inf) of xn*e-x is equal to factorial of n.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up