Leave a comment

Comments 3

capesofwrath December 23 2008, 22:16:56 UTC
Oh, Nathan. I think the writers did a horrible job with his character. They took him from good guy to bad guy with no apparent reason very quickly and with no explanation. Even Smallville knew how to turn good guys bad. SMALLVILLE. Come on, Heroes.

Wait, Sylar's dead again? What with the writers wasting our time by pretending to kill the main characters I forget which characters they put on the brink of death by the end of the episode.

I was so happy to see Sylar back, even if he's still talking about repentance and shit like that. I just ignore the parts where he's all, "I have a soul and this hurts and oh, man pain, man pain," because I'm not buying this. Sylar just kills people and is generally crazy and has no angst about it.

Phew. I was worried Castiel was leaving for a minute there, too. THAT WOULD FUCKING SUCK OUT LOUD.

Reply

lunaste December 23 2008, 22:27:02 UTC
Yes, Nathan was so amazing in S1 and two, in S1 he was this shady, smarmy politician who turned out to be a very confused pawn (but could still be an asshole at times), and he got more and more awesome, also because of his love for Peter (I say this not ONLY from a Petrellicesty place ( ... )

Reply

capesofwrath January 5 2009, 02:01:12 UTC
I know! Nathan used to have character development and then they just tried to turn him evil and hope that we'd just roll with it and not question it. UM, HELLO. I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up