that puzzle really really bothers me. i mean the answer is that youre supposed to switch to the other door right? but wtffff that seriously doesnt make sense ahhhh T.T cuz like i remember how someone explained it to me once but i realized last time i thought about this puzzle that the explanation was total bs...and meh i just lost
OoOoOoOo ..but you're such a nerrrd! You're supposed to be able to figure it out! (And the reason why it bothers you is 'cause it's counterintuitive.) And damn, I really love my book (the one that I'm reading.. apparently I read). It has so many mathy references.. and even all the chapters are numbered by odd primes. It's so awesome.
i mean it seems like you really should be doing conditional probability...like, ok say you picked door 1, door 2 is revealed to not be it, door 3 is the other one...you REALLY care about
p(door 3 being it | door 2 isnt)
which really ought to be the same as
p(door 1 being it | door 2 isnt)
...i mean meh? the explanation i heard totally doesnt take into account the idea of conditional probability, which is really important...
yeah I'd think that it'd take into account the conditional probability as well ('cause the chance that the car is behind the door that you chose isn't 1/2, like most people would think)
Comments 21
Reply
..but you're such a nerrrd! You're supposed to be able to figure it out! (And the reason why it bothers you is 'cause it's counterintuitive.) And damn, I really love my book (the one that I'm reading.. apparently I read). It has so many mathy references.. and even all the chapters are numbered by odd primes. It's so awesome.
Reply
p(door 3 being it | door 2 isnt)
which really ought to be the same as
p(door 1 being it | door 2 isnt)
...i mean meh? the explanation i heard totally doesnt take into account the idea of conditional probability, which is really important...
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment