Update title of FAQ 80? (community management)

Mar 12, 2004 03:00

First off, apologies if this is not the write place of if I should format proposals like this differently ( Read more... )

cat-comm-manage, faq80, status-resolved

Leave a comment

Comments 11

halfawake March 12 2004, 00:24:34 UTC
This is the right place for FAQ modification proposals.

I personally would rather keep the title as it is. The modified wording that you propose suggests that the user invite people to their community and some people consider those email invitaitons spam. I think they should keep the promotions to community_promo. Although on the other hand, it may be a good idea to change the title because inviting users is what the FAQ is about and it makes more sense considering that adding users implies that they get added automatically, which certainly isn't true. So I guess it could go either way.

Reply


xtremesaints March 12 2004, 01:38:05 UTC
while we're discussing closed membership emails...I suspect there's a problem with the emails being sent out; if you have a space after the username then the member won't be sent an invitation even though the success page pops up. This happened everytime when someone told me on IRC they still didn't get the email until I removed the space.

Okay, now that I ranted about it in a totally irrelevant post, off I go.

Reply

acerbic March 12 2004, 05:01:02 UTC
A post about this would be great in helpscreening, since we seem to see those every once in a while, and that's definitely something that could be a problem.

Reply

xtremesaints March 13 2004, 15:22:03 UTC
Or would zilla be better? I really am not sure because perhaps it's not a widespread occurance...or maybe it does happen to everyone. Either one, I'd prefer more testing for confirmation.

Reply

burr86 March 13 2004, 23:32:26 UTC
I'd zilla it. The thingy should auto-remove spaces and stuff before processing the username.

Reply


lyspeth March 12 2004, 02:04:41 UTC
It's always helpful to include a link to the FAQ and a note of what category it's in (comms, I hope, in this case :) ).

Reply

seaofdestiny March 12 2004, 03:51:29 UTC
-edits-

Like this?

Reply

lyspeth March 12 2004, 04:37:14 UTC
Yup. Cool.

Reply


jai_dit January 3 2009, 18:42:36 UTC
This got a header and a pretty clear writeup in 80, so marking resolved.

Reply

seaofdestiny January 4 2009, 06:04:22 UTC
Yes, I'd say it's resolved now. Thanks!

...and I had no idea I had written about this (nearly five years ago!). Did you go through the entire community?

Reply

jai_dit January 4 2009, 14:53:31 UTC
Everything that was marked "status-deferred", which extended back several years, yeah.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up