It all depends on the treatment she had for the cancer and how advanced it was. If she had extensive radiotherapy/chemotherapy/surgery she might be infertile, but decent gynaecological oncologists will do their best to reduce the risks of that happening. If that isn't an issue and we're just talking being down to one ovary and no damage to the fallopian tubes and uterus, she should be just about as fertile as she would be normally.
There's also, given where she works, the potential to have complete hand-waviness - if you're going to go in for the "fertility Artifact" penny, you might as well go in for the pound. Considering she had a canon pregnancy without insemination because Artifact...
If the cancer was caught early they would remove the affected ovary and then wait a few weeks for additional blood tests. If the margins were good on the removed ovary (No sign of the cancer breaking through the outer edge of the ovary) and no markers show up in her blood work, they would do no further treatment, just blood tests every 6 months. My daughter went through this and had a baby about a year after she was given the all clear.
If she had chemo the odds of getting pregnant again are very low, but not zero. Some women also freeze ovarian tissue before having this treatment and there have been successful pregnancies from that. There is a risk of the cancer returning during pregnancy (especially with a cancer sensitive to estrogen which ovarian tumours often are) so if she decides to go ahead with the pregnancy she will be monitored closely.
Comments 9
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment