But the fact of the matter is that gender is a linguistic term with a hard meaning.
So is "etymological fallacy"For example, all languages have gender pronouns, [...]
Er, no.
Not even most, and
even of those who do, a large number don't use sex as a basis for assigning gender.
(Inspired by some statements in
idiotolects,
pronouns,
gender,
possessives
Comments 30
Could anyone clarify? I'm tired and probably not thinking this through properly.
Reply
BTW, modern Chinese grammarians went two better than their European models and created written variants of 他 to refer specifically to animals (牠) and inanimate bzw. abstract objects (它).
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I couldn't even read the whole thing. That article accomplished something few can - annoy me on three different levels: as a human being, as a person that enjoys languages, and has a science major. The science part comes from a) gender being a matter of social norms and b) even if one talks about sex instead of gender, it's still not a binary system.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment