(Untitled)

[leapyearlefty]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43463

Some of you were criticizing my use of a biased source of information about the Terri Schiavo case.  So here's my unbiased source.  You can read about the website here to judge for yourself:  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/resources/about_WND.asp

The article is very long, but it'

Comments

[jeff_matzke]

Worldnetdaily is NOT an unbiased source. They have a definite agenda to empower the Christian Right. For example if you go to their bookstore you will find dozens of books refuting evolution, a theory which biologists have claimed to be the cornerstone of their science. I am not attacking ignorantly, I used to frequent WND all the time when I was a Christian. Claiming it is unbiased is akin to claiming Hitler loved the Jews. It just ain't true.

[leapyearlefty]

well, i'm sorry then. i did my best. i do believe, though, that they did the best job of reporting everything that BOTH sides said without inserting any interpretation. if you want, read part of the article and see if you agree. they certainly did a better job than the mainstream media.

[jeff_matzke]

My experience with WND is to take EVERYTHING they say with an entire pound of salt.

[leapyearlefty]

if you find a source that you find unbiased, please let me know. for real. i'm tired of reading people's opinions disguised as journalism. what news do you read?