Sherlock Holmes - A Small Matter of Ownership

Apr 03, 2010 01:03

Title: A Small Matter of Ownership
Word Count: 528
Rating: PG-13
Characters/Pairings: Holmes, Mary, implied Holmes/Watson (you'll see)
Spoilers: Only for some old theory...
Warnings: The deliberate and willful warping of psychoanalytic theory.
Disclaimer: Anything you recognise is not mine.
Notes: This is anna_bm  's fault. Please do not take it as an ( Read more... )

rating: pg-13, character: sherlock holmes, fandom: sherlock holmes, character: mary morstan

Leave a comment

Comments 14

beeinmybonnet April 2 2010, 16:11:33 UTC
OH MY GOD, YOU'RE FAST.

ALSO, YOU PRETTY MUCH RULE THE UNIVERSE. HERE, HAVE MY SOUL.


... )

Reply

queerlyobscure April 2 2010, 16:30:19 UTC
I suspect I have regained my ~MOJO~! I am totally getting stuff written this morning (admittedly in bits all over the place but I'll take what I can get).

I shall forgo your soul, as you might need it, and instead steal your .gif like a thief in the night because it is that awesome.

Mostly I am glad you are happy and not, y'know, mortified.

Reply

beeinmybonnet April 2 2010, 16:36:30 UTC
Really? That's wonderful! \o/ So it wouldn't be too horrible of me to, say, ask you to work on that second, shorter AU we're working on, then? (By the way, are out projects supposed to be ~secret~ or not?)

No, no I insist. Take it. You can have the gif as well. I nicked it from this place.

Why would I be mortified? You silly goose. ♥

Reply

queerlyobscure April 2 2010, 16:57:30 UTC
If you'd rather the second than the first, I shall endeavour to deliver. (I don't know, are they? Should we be inventing codewords or making trailers or teasers or w/e. I can never tell...)

Well, if you insist *goes to find a bottle to put it in*

I dunno, I guess I keep mistaking you for someone with a sense of decorum :P

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

queerlyobscure April 2 2010, 16:58:38 UTC
Hee! *giggles*

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

queerlyobscure April 2 2010, 18:09:21 UTC
Holmes is nothing if not a master of logic *serious nod*.

Naturally he is possessive; would you give Watson up, if you had him? :D

Reply


ends_of_time April 2 2010, 18:22:19 UTC
Not only have you utterly demolished any sort of respect for Freud I may have harbored, but you have also ensured that I shall fail my next psychology exam because all I will be thinking about is this.

And for that, I heartily thank you.

PS. May i just say I love how all of Holmes' masterful, educated argument can be broken down into: HIS COCK IS MINE AND NOT FOR YOU!!!! I think this is genius.

Reply

queerlyobscure April 2 2010, 18:36:56 UTC
Always happy to corrupt the minds of others :D

I wish I could claim credit for that idea, but anna_bm was the one who sent me an email stating that obviously Watson's penis was Holmes' property, according to Freud. However, I feel it is an excellent argument :D

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

queerlyobscure April 2 2010, 20:02:45 UTC
Freudian theory - 100% more palatable when delivered in terms of Holmes' ownership of Watson's penis y/n? :D

Glad you enjoyed it!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up