For once in my life, I actually agree with the Bush administration's
stance on an issue. That I find myself agreeing with their logic (if not their diplomacy and politicking surrounding their decision) is perhaps less distressing than the fact that my agreement with their policy has caused me to double- and triple-check my reasoning. I suppose I
(
Read more... )
Comments 15
Well, Bush is a *kind* of internationalist (the hegemonic corporatist kind, yep) and that will put him in conflict with a certain kind of isolationist-protectionist provincialism at times. Note also how many in his party are pissed at his moves to liberalizing citizenship issues with Mexico, rather that putting all the immigrants on a fast train back south. So, this is why we'll find him at times agreeing with some things.
But yes, it's worth double-checking when you find yourself with strange company. A little while ago I saw some more libertarian-bashing on a popular feminist blog, followed up by some feminist-bashing by macho Randroids. It gave me a moment to reflect, at least, whether there was something wrong with my belief cluster that put me even vaguely near such people.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
I agree that Bush is making the right stand, but I also don't fault the democrats for holding his feet to the fire for his seeming "flip-floping" on the national security issue. It is petty though and I don't think that Bush will really learn the lesson I want him to from it.
Reply
That said, I'm always in awe when our government has a say in the merger of two non-US companies.
Reply
Those rights are ultimately given by the US government, so of course we have a say. We could revoke the right and put it back up for auction if we really wanted...
This is not an anti-trust issue, which is the only case that we can really oppose a merger per se.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment