Five minutes of Wikipedia, however, was enough for me to be clear that Adams was arguing about things that he didn't really care enough to learn very much about, similarly to how I first thought Intelligent Design must mean something rational and religious, but instead takes all the stupid parts of faith and pretends there is some way that it can be applied to science.
But that is entirely beside his point. I think his point when it comes to these sorts of topics, is to start flame wars. And people oblige him, oh how they do. I think Adams knows enough about philosophy to start a flame war.
My point was simply that the comments read like at least half of the people making them hadn't read carefully either Adams' or the Angry guy's posts.
Comments 8
Internet rules state that no one reads what they are about to comment on. Ever.
Reply
And I about to kill the three kids that just came into the office that want to hear their own voices. Screaming turds.
Reply
Though I dearly wish to.
Reply
Indeed. reading.ahead--
Reply
Reply
But that is entirely beside his point. I think his point when it comes to these sorts of topics, is to start flame wars. And people oblige him, oh how they do. I think Adams knows enough about philosophy to start a flame war.
My point was simply that the comments read like at least half of the people making them hadn't read carefully either Adams' or the Angry guy's posts.
Reply
Reply
I am not certain why I ask the questions I do, but you've always got an answer.
Even if the answer is a question.
Reply
Leave a comment