The conclusion of last night's episode left me confused and disappointed and angry and irritable. Oh, and did I mention confused? Continuity gods, why dost thou continue to forsake us? Our forgiveness for last season's Tritter arc wasn't a large enough sacrifice?
And speaking of arcs. I enjoyed the Stacy arc. *ducks*
I tolerated the Vogler arc
(
Read more... )
Comments 85
The newbies...could care less. Foreman...never liked him but last night I realized he needs to move next to Cuddy and become an adminstrator because he sucks as a doctor. He ONCE AGAIN made judgements about the patient and then refused to do anything missing out on a NEUROLOGICAL issue that pointed to what was wrong with the patient. He isn't House 2.0 he's Cuddy 2.0 and sucks at that as well.
I have more but my bus to work is on its way. Can we continue this later?
Reply
When Cuddy said Neurological I was wondering wear in the world Foremon was. I thought that was his specialty or something. We don't need another Cuddy, especially because of how Cuddy's been acting lately.
Reply
In the case of this episode, the test was a false positive. The best doctors in the world can get false positives through no fault of their own.
Reply
there's a Big Point to all this? in my more cynical moments, i believe that point to be that the producers and writers got together at about mid-season two, and said "let's see how much lack of continuity and inconsistent characterizations we can throw into this thing and still pull in the ratings."
but in my less cynical moments? see my 'doris egan dream,' above. :)
Reply
Reply
i never thought i'd say this, but i did too.
did i really, truly, actually say that i preferred the tritter arc???
Reply
Reply
you're welcome. and i'll join you. we'll eat chinese food and laugh, and treat each other like human beings. and we'll make jokes that are actually intelligent and funny, and don't overly rely on adolescent bathroom humor or human anatomy. and we'll throw in an occasional serious discussion. it'll be just like old times.
sigh.....
Reply
Now we get slapstick physical humour and a new Ducklings chorus that is so uninteresting that it makes manila filing folders look like The Next Big Thing.
Let's watch. And remember.
Reply
Since I'm one of those people, maybe you could tell me what it was?
Reply
*wilson--through an incorrect test result--misdiagnosed a patient as terminal.
*house found the above fascinating, and so sat in when wilson informed the patient of the misdiagnosis.
*the patient reacted with horror instead of euphoria.
*wilson felt guilty, and house, suspecting that wilson would want to fix things, correctly assumed that wilson would attempt to compensate the patient for his stated $6000 loss on the sale of his home.
*house confronted wilson about wilson's plan to pay the patient from his own bank account.
*
and at this point, the writer begins to count upon the viewer's skill at inference--and the following is what i inferred*when house couldn't make wilson "see reason," house went to the patient and suggested that--if he sued wilson--he could come out of this with much more than $6000 ( ... )
Reply
Thanks for clearing it up, though!
Reply
These days, nothing connects. There's no common thread, there's no similar situation, and there's no awareness. Things just happen for no reason, or reasons that make no sense. I no longer want to see what happens next because I'm interested. I want to see what happens next because I need to see if there's anything better. And continuously I've been let down.
I hope the new year brings something good.
Reply
what a succinct way to put it! and i believe that statement resounds with many of us previously enthusiastic viewers, as we continue to watch, hands partially covering our eyes, for the incipient train wreck. thank you.
edited because sometimes i do know how to spell 'succinct'!
Reply
Leave a comment