I can't take it anymore!

May 11, 2006 15:20

Okay, fashion world? Celebritantes? All the semi-drunk sophomores wandering around the university? We have to talk.


Read more... )

fashion, humor

Leave a comment

Comments 23

rachiestar May 11 2006, 20:49:39 UTC
In general, I'm not a fan of anti-body-type egalitarian fashion trends. But as far as legwear-choices-that-only-vaguely-make-aesthetic-sense-if-you-are-tall-and-skinny go, I don't think leggings are half as bad as gauchos.


... )

Reply

katranna May 11 2006, 21:37:14 UTC
No! Yikes!

Both of those look awful, except I've seen people pull off gauchos with boots (not with flip-flops like in that pic), and that can't be said for leggings.

Anyway, almost all fashion trends exclude one body type and flatter another; that's to be expected. There should just always be other options available.

Reply


lotus_faerie May 11 2006, 21:11:21 UTC
Aughh! My eyes!

Reply


greensword May 11 2006, 21:56:01 UTC
This is tongue in cheek, right?

Reply

katranna May 12 2006, 00:11:40 UTC
What do you mean? I really do hate this look, and I really do hate 80s fashion...

Reply

greensword May 12 2006, 01:03:17 UTC
I don't know. I find any sort of fashion snobbery kind of ridiculous.

(Also, weren't you like, eight, in the 80s?)

Reply

katranna May 12 2006, 01:08:50 UTC
It's not snobbery! It's common sense! Leggings are not attractive! They're like... mutated longjohns.

And yeah, I was young, but fashion always bleeds over into the next decade by a few years. Also, 80s movies were enough to make me properly scared.

Reply


glamourcorpse May 11 2006, 23:14:45 UTC
I wear black tights. Does that get my fashion police badge revoked?

Reply

katranna May 12 2006, 00:12:12 UTC
Tights are not the same as leggings. :-)

Reply

FEW! glamourcorpse May 12 2006, 13:01:39 UTC
Good. I never want to be anymore of a fashion tragedy then I already am. ;)

Reply

DOH! glamourcorpse May 12 2006, 13:03:40 UTC
I've never done that before, that was me. How not awake am I to post with out logging in.

Reply


nemo85 May 12 2006, 00:12:20 UTC
that entry should have come with a warning on it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up