Books read, 2007

[kateorman]

Comments

[jonquil]

I think Jon needs a present.

http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/3698691.htm

[kateorman]

Eeeee!

[mrteufel]

Oodles of fun!

[dinosaurcostume]

"There is no gender differentiation of the Ood."

So now we get our continuity information from the Argos catalogue, rather than books by Peter Haining or Terrance Dicks?

[rodinia]

Just came along your journal and read 2007, 31. I thought: panic, it's already that date. Then I realised the exam I'm currently learning for is 30 March and I panicked again because I thought I missed it, and then, after having wiped my eyes that the date on this entry is 31 december. Dear Kate, you really know how to scare visitors who just come strolling past.

[kateorman]

Ay yi yi yi yi yi!

[outsdr]

Kate-

So glad I found your blog here! I've been wondering what you've been up to- I miss the occasional "What Kate's been up to" newsletters you'd send out, and I _definitly_ miss your Doctor Who novels. I look forward to reading over things here and catching up. Hope John is doing well, as well. Tell him Maryland hasn't changed much, at least it hadn't when I was there last in December.

[kateorman]

Hey dude! Long time no see!

[outsdr]

I'm off to the beginning of your blog, all the way back to 2004... joined Jon's as well. Ordered some of your books I haven't got yet, but it looks like I'm not going to ever get "So vile a sin"... there's 3 of them on amazon.com, the cheapest going for $128.96!

So never fear, you're obviously still a wonderfully popular lady! See you back in 2004...

128

[hexacontium]

$128?!?
WOW. Is that you Kate, selling them there? *grin*
I recently got it off Ebay.co.uk for ~30 Pounds, which is still a lot for a pocket book. But you might give it a try, p&p to the States is not that much. I'll probably never get "Room with no doors" in mint condition. Should it appears on Ebay its old and damaged, and I'm kind of blacklisted on Amazon because I dared to disagree once when working for them.

ARGGHHH

[outsdr]

Ok, so I'm about halfway through August 2004 now. And there are so many posts I've read that I wanted to comment on, but it seemed really weird to comment on things nearly three years past.

So, would it be weird to make comments?

On an different tack, why is the latest post in your LJ dated December 31st, 2007?

Re: ARGGHHH

[kateorman]

My suggestion: read backwards until you get bored. (Comment on whatever you like, though. :-)

The forward dating on my "books read" posting keeps it at the top of my LJ, where I can gaze at it in ill-read despair.

Re: ARGGHHH

[outsdr]

Although it makes my head hurt, I may have to do so. But I'm reading about 1/4 of a year a night... so I'll be caught up in about a week. There are specific events I'm looking forward to reading that I'm sure you've written about: each season of the new Doctor Who series, Craig Hinton's death, etc. I think what I'll continue reading current postings, and reading past postings in order, until I'm totally caught up. I'm not going to back track just to post comments, but as I continue reading, I'll comment here and there, I'm sure.

Re: ARGGHHH

[murasaki_1966]

Nice idea.

And, I'm impressed. the list is in alphabetical order by author. How very librarian of you. Maybe you're a member of our secret society.
http://www.slgpublishing.com/prev_rex/prev_rex.html

[outsdr]

Not sure where to stick this (insert joke here), but I bet you'll enjoy this:

http://consumerist.com/consumer/netflix/netflix-recommends-moses-movie-for-lovers-of-death-wish-3-250077.php

[kateorman]

Clint Eastwood is Gideon!