Books read, 2007

[kateorman]

Comments

ARGGHHH

[outsdr]

Ok, so I'm about halfway through August 2004 now. And there are so many posts I've read that I wanted to comment on, but it seemed really weird to comment on things nearly three years past.

So, would it be weird to make comments?

On an different tack, why is the latest post in your LJ dated December 31st, 2007?

Re: ARGGHHH

[kateorman]

My suggestion: read backwards until you get bored. (Comment on whatever you like, though. :-)

The forward dating on my "books read" posting keeps it at the top of my LJ, where I can gaze at it in ill-read despair.

Re: ARGGHHH

[outsdr]

Although it makes my head hurt, I may have to do so. But I'm reading about 1/4 of a year a night... so I'll be caught up in about a week. There are specific events I'm looking forward to reading that I'm sure you've written about: each season of the new Doctor Who series, Craig Hinton's death, etc. I think what I'll continue reading current postings, and reading past postings in order, until I'm totally caught up. I'm not going to back track just to post comments, but as I continue reading, I'll comment here and there, I'm sure.

Re: ARGGHHH

[murasaki_1966]

Nice idea.

And, I'm impressed. the list is in alphabetical order by author. How very librarian of you. Maybe you're a member of our secret society.
http://www.slgpublishing.com/prev_rex/prev_rex.html

Re: ARGGHHH

[kateorman]

If I was really on form, it'd be in Library of Congress call number order.