So
lost_spook said "yay for having nice books to read!" and I was starting to chatter at her about ALL THE NICE BOOKS (and possibly nice books) that I have found on Project Gutenberg and not read yet, and it began to be... a bit infinitely long. So I moved it to a post! XD
(
Cut for the sake of your freedom of choice about whether to read it )
Comments 14
Also, you are the third person today who has posted something claiming it is at least partly my doing. *guilty* I definitely need to get better and retrieve my life, before I oppress my poor flist to death, or they all do something horrible to stop me.
Reply
And you need not feel guilty at all. I tend to feel guilty babbling about random stuff that interests me unless somebody on my flist has expressed interest, because I'm all like "I will be cluttering up their friends pages, onoes!" So you see you're giving me an excuse to post. XD
(I am so messed up in my head. *wry grin* Also I have been reading far too much Terry Pratchett and contracted a temporary case of Vimesian over-bluntness, oy. *looks back dubiously at comment box*)
But really, I do not in the least mind being oppressed to read new books. Ask lolmac. XD I like new books, and I am always using them up.
Reply
And, LOL, babbling about random things is what LJ is all about, isn't it?
Reply
Re: the author of your translation of 1001 Nights, it probably really is anonymous. There are a few translations that are generally seen as the major/important ones, but there were also a lot of other translations, though which generally cribbed a lot from the major ones. So it's probably one of those. But it makes me very happy that you are reading the Nights! I'll look forward to hearing what you think of it!
re: Rose in Bloom, please do give your long rant! I would be very curious to hear it!
Reply
But then you read Rose in Bloom. Which, if you recall, is the sequel to Eight Cousins: there are seven boys and one girl, okay, and they're all growing up. Four of the boys are old enough to get married, right? So, okay, one of the boys marries the girl, and another one marries her friend who was a supporting character in the first book. A third gets engaged to a random girl introduced for the purpose. And the fourth, who is "fast" and would not really make a good husband? Dies tragically.
And then there is Jo's Boys. It's not quite so obvious, because Nan doesn't get married and Bess doesn't die (although I still get slightly cranky about the "strong women don't get married ( ... )
Reply
(I'm totally cool with Nan not getting married because she is AWESOME and also I am happy to think of her as ace. And I actually like that there's a lot of random girls, because really most people don't actually marry their childhood friends but people they meet in their adult lives.)
Reply
(I don't mind the random girls as much as I do the DEADNESS for everyone who doesn't get married. Except Nan. They just kind of serve to emphasize - "here's a girl for Franz! here's a girl for Emil! here's a girl for Demi! here's a girl for Tommy! Oops, no girl for Dan; he has to go out West and get deaded, for he is Unsuitable for a girl twelve years his junior and clearly there is nobody else for him evar." Sorry, this conversation is obviously making me a bit cranky. *wry face*)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Ooh, that's good to know, thanks! *makes note*
Any suggestions for particularly good Verne translations? I've got Project Gutenberg editions at the moment, but I can always ransack the local library if necessary. (They're fairly fabulous at some things.)
Reply
Reply
Recently I knocked off all 673 pages of Seven Pillars of Wisdom by T.E. Lawrence, and felt rather proud of myself. That one had been on my kindle almost since the first day I got it. If you like descriptions of wind, sun, dust blowing into camel's eyes, or the many varieties of desert terrain, this is the book!
If you haven't yet read the Ship Manifesto for Jo/Laurie, you must! There's some fascinating history about Alcott's reaction to the shippers. http://ship-manifesto.livejournal.com/237830.html
Reply
Leave a comment