(Untitled)

Dec 15, 2004 17:03

A number of people responded to my previous post about rec sites created by people who aren't familiar with the show whose fanfic they're recommending. I started to respond to the comments, but each time I got myself tied in knots, and I began to realize that my thinking about this issue is very muddled and tied inextricably with some of my ( Read more... )

fannish feelings, rants, fic preferences, rec sites, obsession

Leave a comment

Comments 45

bethbethbeth December 15 2004, 22:17:52 UTC
I was thinking about the commenter who said - with no first-hand knowledge of the source material - that Bodie was out of character. After I finished laughing, I thought, well...maybe she's unfamiliar with the source material but moderately familiar with the fanfiction, in which case she meant (regardless of whether she knew it or not): "This Bodie is out of character relative to the other Bodies I've come across in other stories."

If that's *not* what she was thinking, well...the only other alternative reading I have is that she thought Bodie was inconsistently characterized *within* the story itself (what story was it, J?)

Like you, I am extremely wary of reccers who admit to not knowing canon (like...at all) in the fandoms they're reccing, but I'm even more wary of *authors* who don't know canon for the fandoms in which they're writing, and yet even some of *them* can surprise me every once in a while.

Reply

justacat December 15 2004, 22:54:22 UTC
The story was the_shoshanna's Never Let Me Down; the crack_van rec is here.

And I'm not precisely sure what the commenter was saying. She didn't appear to have much familiarity with fanfic, and she hadn't read enough of the story to know whether it was internally inconsistent (which it most assuredly isn't). I'd be interested to know your take on it. It left me ... boggled!

And I'm definitely much more wary of authors who don't know canon. I mean, there's nothing *wrong* with putting up a rec page while not knowing canon - my reaction really isn't rational at all! I mean, *wariness* is rational, but my irritation is a bit disproportionate and clearly goes beyond the surface issue ...

Reply

bethbethbeth December 15 2004, 23:20:38 UTC
Okay, I think I get it now. *g ( ... )

Reply

justacat December 16 2004, 02:51:08 UTC
How do you think you would have reacted to the points she raised if she hadn't contextualized the whole thing by saying "I don't know the show...?"

Entirely differently. It's not that her questions weren't legitimate (I don't agree either, but still, I could see a fan of Pros asking those questions, I suppose) - it's that she had the presumptuousness to cast a judgment knowing nothing whatsoever about what she was speaking.

And as for your first point - I agree entirely. I mean, I have a hard time judging individual stories in a particular fandom until after I've read a whole bunch (I didn't feel qualified to rec Pros on crack_van even last month, thinking there was still so much I hadn't read), much less judging a story before I've even finished it. Finish the damn story, watch a few eps - or at least read the intro to the fandom provided right there on crack_van,/i> - and then come back to me with your questions!!!

Reply


cathexys December 15 2004, 22:26:48 UTC
very interesting post!! but you knew i'd disagree ( ... )

Reply

justacat December 15 2004, 22:39:44 UTC
Heh, I was responding to your comment to the other post as you were writing this!

This brings me to your post, where i find a similar and, I'd say, equally faulty deduction, namely that readers who do not know the source text are not fannish....I wonder if someone who reads without source text knowledge automatically *is* such an outsiderI think I must not have been clear on this point. I agree with you entirely - I probably didn't emphasize this enough - that one need know nothing of source to be a true fan - in fact I think what I said was "I know very well that someone can be a 'real' fan, can entirely belong in this world and "get it" in every sense of the word, without knowing one iota of the canon for a particular fandom." I *firmly* believe that fannishness is a quality that has nothing whatsoever to do with familiarity with source ( ... )

Reply

butchering heaney cathexys December 16 2004, 01:03:37 UTC
i always enjoy having civilized debates with people with whom i disagree :D and usually going meta helps keep tempers in check!!!

seriously, though, i thought you'd used the term primal :-)

and now i'm realizing that you just used outrage and i immediately thought of that seamus heaney poem punishment which i adore, where the last lines are: "who would connive / in civilized outrage / yet understand the exact / and tribal, intimate revenge ( ... )

Reply

Re: butchering heaney justacat December 16 2004, 02:22:18 UTC
Civilized debate is always good ... I really really prefer to stay civilized - I love fandom, it's fun for me, it's an escape and a pleasure, and while I take it seriously in a certain sense, I generally have a pretty amiable attitude about most things, and I rarely find an issue worth getting into a temper, or a feud or something. Maybe I've got my head buried in the sand, but I like to think we're all here for the same reason, we're all on the same side ...

Especially because I vacillate wildly, and I can see all sides of many of the issues - especially this one.

The thing is, I really really really do see the other side here. As kaiz said below, there are all types of rec sites, and really, I think that's wonderful, fabulous, great. Who am I to tell someone not to post a rec site because she's not familiar with canon? So the intellectual, logical side of me, which usually predominates, is telling me to stop making a fuss, to each her own. And I believe that ( ... )

Reply


Vile Bodies executrix December 15 2004, 22:41:56 UTC
Maybe there are two axes involves (as in more than one axis, not more than one axe!). The best stories are in the Fine Fiction, Fine Fanfiction quadrant. It's the stuff below the line of acceptable fictional quality that I don't like to read.

There's also the phenomenon of writers who are known for writing very well in multiple fandoms. I suspect that a lot of readers who are enthusiastic about stories written in a domain about which they know very little are, e.g., fans of M. Fae Glasgow or cesperanza, and they'd read Refrigerator/Refrigerator Magnet or Sodium/Chloride if they wrote 'em.

Reply

Re: Vile Bodies justacat December 15 2004, 23:06:05 UTC
You say axes, I say axes ( ... )

Reply

Re: Vile Bodies executrix December 15 2004, 23:28:32 UTC
The Bodie in the Library?

Or, if it's The King's Two Bodies, I guess the natural one.

But Fridge/Magnet is a natural for angst, because they're so different but they're drawn together...and Na/Cl have chemistry.

Reply

Re: Vile Bodies justacat December 16 2004, 03:24:45 UTC
But Fridge/Magnet is a natural for angst, because they're so different but they're drawn together...and Na/Cl have chemistry.

::snorts into keyboard and snickers madly::

(you seem to have that effect on me :-D)

(Oh, and maybe PB&J stick together??? I'm afraid I'm not in your league ....)

Reply


kaiz December 15 2004, 23:06:07 UTC
Ah, okay! Thanks so much for explaining! I get where you're coming from now. (please tell me if I'm wildly off base!!!!) And...I think I understand also why I am not bothered by recs coming from people who are unfamiliar with canon.

I think it's a difference in how you and I think about recs and recs pages. Specifically, it's a issue about *judgement* and the criteria the creator of a recs page is (or isn't) using to select those recs.

You say:

I think it's because, though I like to think I'm a decent judge of writing/fiction, I'm in fandom because I'm a *fan* and I want to read *fanfiction,* and I have an underlying, mostly unexamined, assumption/expectation that someone who takes it upon themselves to create a rec page for a fandom is implicitly holding themselves out to be qualified not merely to judge "fiction," but to judge *fanfiction in that fandom,* to tell *fans* what (in her opinion) is and isn't worth reading.Which seems to indicate to me that: 1) you see reccers as arbiters of fanfic quality esp. as it relates to ( ... )

Reply

cathexys December 16 2004, 00:55:37 UTC
see, that's why i love your rec page...i sometimes end up with fics that don't work for me, but i know what i'm getting...i know your criteria and that's important!

Reply

blktauna December 16 2004, 02:31:40 UTC

Now, I haven't addressed the issue of whether a person can be a "true" fan and yet never have seen the series or read the texts

What are they a 'fan' of then?

Reply

kaiz December 16 2004, 03:07:00 UTC
A person can be a fan of fandom, or even a fan of the fanfic itself. As an example, there are plenty of fandoms where I have only seen one or two shows (at the most) but I still enjoy the fanfic and seek it out. Even folks who have never been able to see the shows (esp. manga and/or anime or shows from long ago--i.e. Battlestar Galactica). I know plenty of people in that kind of situation; I'm definitely not an aberration in that respect. :-)

Reply


zebra363 December 17 2004, 06:01:48 UTC
I remember seeing a post once about the differences between FANfiction and FanFICTION. Wish I could remember where it was, as I think it summed up nicely the difference between those who think the canon is a vital part of the fannish experience and those who don't ( ... )

Reply

blktauna December 17 2004, 21:42:51 UTC
Are we the same person?!?!?!

;)

My first actions after finding stories I like in a fandom - if I can't immediately lay hands on the episodes - are to read the transcripts, download wav files of the dialogue, look at online photos and read episode reviews.

Oh My YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I would argue that in many fandoms you CANNOT get a realistic idea of the characters only from reading fanfic.

Ho yes... Screaming crying Doyle... so not right. Fragile, bruised waiflike Illya... mmmm no... Big Butch Jim and damsel Blair... Blaahahahaha.... Although the Man Song vid does show their relationship so well...

I actively enjoy "assessing" fic for adherence to / plausible extrapolations from canon.are we not the same person... *looks over shoulder ( ... )

Reply

leethet January 30 2005, 00:26:06 UTC
Fragile, bruised waiflike Illya... mmmm no...

What? IK's not a girly man???? Well, heck...

Reply

blktauna January 30 2005, 08:10:22 UTC
Ohh Pool Boy!!!! ;)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up