ROYALLY CONFUSED!

Oct 02, 2007 15:48

OK, I do not get on LJ very often but as many of you know I was on there posting to myth comms about Dean's Amulet, not neccasarily to prove that it is real, but to see if if it was actually based of a any real myth.  today I received a reply to one of these post that sent me into land of confusion.   Now I either need help setting the chick/dude ( Read more... )

supernatural

Leave a comment

Comments 2

taintedangel80 October 2 2007, 20:27:01 UTC
I can tell you, definitely, it will be covered this season. So that person is dead wrong on that. In the 8th episode we learn where it came from, and who gave it to Dean. (I already know from spoilers and reading sides). I am not sure though, if we will learn of any significance it has (if it means anything important) though.

Reply

just4jensenra October 2 2007, 23:22:11 UTC
HAHA! I knew I read that one of the episodes was covering it (didn't know which one) I thought maybe I was just imaging things. So she is for fact wrong about them not having a plan for amulet this season. Now all I have to do is prove her wrong on the other stuff.

1) Kripke making stuff upp .. If she researched more (like Kripke said to do at the beginning of Season One) then she would realize that most of the legends used were from Norse Mythology.

2) Why would they release a book, about the legends/myths each show since season one telling/explaining the myth.legend it was based off or around, if he was just making this shit up anyways???

3) Didn't Kripke say there was a 5-7yr plan, in many interviews? I could have swore that it what he said during the Paley Event!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up